Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel, ten million acres of forest have been lost there since 1960, resulting in wood now costing eight times as much to collect and distribute than in 1960.
resulting in wood now costing eight times as much to collect and distribute than
resulting in wood now costing eight times as much to collect and distribute as
resulting in wood now costing eight times as much to collect and distribute than it did
and as a result wood now costs eight times as much to collect and distribute as it did
and wood now costs eight times as much as a result to collect and distribute than
B错在resulting in wood,这个表达有歧义,now costing eight times as much to collect是修饰wood的,在GMAT中,这种修饰需要拿掉再去看,如果拿掉的话,句子就直接变成了resulting in wood,无意义。
B:直接导致wood有问题。
前后两句话是有因果关系的,因此在一开始考虑的时候,我优先把后者降为状语,表示前者的一个结果。如果D没有“ as a result”,而仅仅表示并列,那意思就差很多了,有了这个词组,给两句话套上了一个因果联系,而不是单纯的并列关系。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论