Lightbox, Inc., owns almost all of the movie theaters in Washington County and has announced plans to double the number of movie screens it has in the county within five years. Yet attendance at Lightbox's theaters is only just large enough for profitability now and the county's population is not expected to increase over the next ten years. Clearly, therefore, if there is indeed no increase in population, Lightbox's new screens are unlikely to prove profitable.
Which of the following, if true about Washington County, most seriously weakens the argument?
Though little change in the size of the population is expected, a pronounced shift toward a younger, more affluent, and more entertainment-oriented population is expected to occur.
The sales of snacks and drinks in its movie theaters account for more of Lightbox's profits than ticket sales do.
In selecting the mix of movies shown at its theaters, Lightbox's policy is to avoid those that appeal to only a small segment of the moviegoing population.
Spending on video purchases, as well as spending on video rentals, is currently no longer increasing.
There are no population centers in the county that are not already served by at least one of the movie theaters that Lightbox owns and operates.
计划把镇上所有电影院荧幕数量翻倍,但是目前的收入刚足够维持利润并且镇上人口不会显著增加。
所以如果人口没有增加,那么新增的电影屏幕将不会有利润。问weaken, 找一个选项证明即便人口不增加,新荧幕还是带来利润。
A选项, 尽管总人口不会有基数变化,但是预计会有更多的更年轻、更富裕、更喜欢娱乐活动的人群出现。correct,指出了实际带来影院收入的人群会增加
错选B,仔细想一下,就算theater是靠卖零食来盈利,可是如果attendance不变的话,依然无法驳斥原文的结论,除非提高零食定价,但这属于自己添加的主观推断了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论