Scientists typically do their most creative work before the age of forty. It is commonly thought that this happens because aging by itself brings about a loss of creative capacity. However, studies show that a disproportionately large number of the scientists who produce highly creative work beyond the age of forty entered their field at an older age than is usual. Since by the age of forty the large majority of scientists have been working in their field for at least fifteen years, the studies' finding strongly suggests that the real reason why scientists over forty rarely produce highly creative work is not that they have simply aged but rather that they generally have spent too long in a given field.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second is an objection that has been raised against a position defended in the argument.
The first is a claim that has been advanced in support of a position that the argument opposes; the second is a finding that has been used in support of that position.
The first is an explanation that the argument challenges; the second is a finding that has been used in support of that explanation.
The first is an explanation that the argument challenges; the second is a finding on which that challenge is based.
The first is an explanation that the argument defends; the second is a finding that has been used to challenge that explanation.
论点:更多在40岁前发表作品;
原因1:黑体1;
注意后面HOWEVER,现象(黑体2);
由此现象,引申出后面的SINCE原因2,并得出真正结论:并非开头所说年纪大才不发表作品,而是因为在领域呆的太久才不发表了。
所以黑体1是所反驳观点的原因;黑体2是支撑起反驳的一个背景研究
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论