Scientists typically do their most creative work before the age of forty. It is commonly thought that this happens because aging by itself brings about a loss of creative capacity. However, studies show that a disproportionately large number of the scientists who produce highly creative work beyond the age of forty entered their field at an older age than is usual. Since by the age of forty the large majority of scientists have been working in their field for at least fifteen years, the studies' finding strongly suggests that the real reason why scientists over forty rarely produce highly creative work is not that they have simply aged but rather that they generally have spent too long in a given field.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second is an objection that has been raised against a position defended in the argument.
The first is a claim that has been advanced in support of a position that the argument opposes; the second is a finding that has been used in support of that position.
The first is an explanation that the argument challenges; the second is a finding that has been used in support of that explanation.
The first is an explanation that the argument challenges; the second is a finding on which that challenge is based.
The first is an explanation that the argument defends; the second is a finding that has been used to challenge that explanation.
这道题,BF1前面有个because,BF2前面shows that,两句中间还有个however,知道是1是个原因,2是个现象,而且两者对立的。并且BF2后面有个since长句贯穿到结尾,说明BF2所在的整句应该是结论,since是解释这个结论的内容。
A:BF1不是position,基于“because”,BF1应该是支持某个position的原因。
B:你看选项怎么说的:BF1 in support 了,BF2也在 in support,不对啊,原文的however说明两者显然对立嘛。
C:BF1是explanation没错,BF2用来支持BF1,错了啊,对立的。
D:没错
E:都however了,哪可能BF1是argument defends的内容,显然是反驳的啊。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论