扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATLA-CR-3
Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.
Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?
Smithtown University's fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university's fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university's fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University's fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.
从别的地方搬来一个解释觉得看懂了！
题外话，如果CR每道都长这样的话...跪了 A选项很tricky以successful开头，晃眼一眼以为说S大学和其他学校一样成功。 其实不然，A说的是S大学的招募人员和其他大学的同行在找 新捐赠者 的成功率是一样的。看到这里还是觉得这不weaken了题干说S大学招募人员在游说 新捐赠者 这方面做得不够好么？ 注意，题干还说了，80%，也就是说M大学招募人员每联络到100人，有80人捐了。这个比例比起其他学校都高很多，也就是，其他学校的招募人员好不容易也联络到了100人，结果只是50人捐了。结合A选项，S大学和其他大学在游说 新捐赠者 的成功率是一样的，而S大学总的成功率高很多，WHY? 结果很明显了，S大学招募人员focus on easy target啊，也就是这80人很多来自以前就捐过钱的金主们，并不是新的捐赠者。即support了原文说再游说新捐赠者这方面做得不够好。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论