扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATLA-CR-3
Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.
Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?
Smithtown University's fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university's fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university's fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University's fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.
【转载】
题目讲这次成功率高，结论是这个成功率不代表好。给出好的标准是综合成功率的提高，得是新顾客的成功率高而不是旧顾客的成功率高。
A. 新顾客的成功率和其他学校一样，说明综合成功率高是由于旧顾客，正确
B. 钱捐多少，无关
C. 旧顾客自己找上门，但是好的标准是新顾客成功率高，旧顾客低
D.新顾客捐的多但未体现成功率，比如旧联系3个有2个人捐，新顾客联系100个5个人捐。
E.新顾客捐的多但未体现成功率，同上。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论