扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATLA-CR-43
Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker's income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.
Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?
The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.
Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.
People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.
The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.
People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.
这题2分钟内根本看不懂关系，提炼一下能看懂的吧
In L, unemployed 有 gov. assist。to 减少 unemploy，gov打算supplement，让那些employed的人的income比gov assistant还少的增加到和gov assist一样多（我这里看懂了，比如umemploy gov assist 30块，有些employed工资20块，那政府出10块来补贴），来让employers hire workers cheaply（我反正2分钟没看懂这个逻辑）。
好了往后内容的逻辑我完全看不懂，只知道1.supplement不会raise any worker's income above gov assist（反正就是计划失败），2.所以umemploy的人 不会有financial incentive to accept jobs（看不懂，猜一下，既然计划失败了，反正就是umemploy还是unemploy呗）
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论