Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker's income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.
Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?
The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.
Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.
People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.
The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.
People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.
P1-context:在L,失业人群享受政府补贴
P2-plan:为了减少失业,政府给那些找到工作但是工资低于补贴金的人提供补贴
ANTI P3-SPECULATION:但是!人们不会从政府那里获得高于补贴的钱
! 除非找到gainfully的工作
C:失业者不会有financial incentive取找新工作,反正有补贴了
我可能是眼瞎。。。这么明显的提示都看不见
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论