Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker's income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.
Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?
The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.
Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.
People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.
The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.
People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.
background: 失业者会得到政府补助的补助金。
P:政府准备补贴那些薪水很低的工人,补充到拿到手的钱和失业救济金一样多的水平。-> C:既然不工作拿到的钱和工作拿到的钱一样多,失业的人没有经济动力去找那些薪水很低的工作了。问weaken
choice a, 政府对失业救济金不收税。irrelevant
choice b,要求最低工资的邻国的失业率比L国失业率更高。irrelevant
choice c, 在职者往往比起失业者能在下一份工作中拿到更高的薪水。correct,指出失业者和在职者两者的区别,打破类比的关系
choice d, 每年失业者从政府那里拿到的救济金比起政府定义的贫困水平要低。irrelevant
choice e, 人们有时候会去接受低薪的工作仅仅是因为喜欢这份工作. slightly strengthen , 从侧面也证明了人们接受低薪的工作并不是出于financial incentives, 而是out of interests
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论