In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic recession because many businesses cut back operations. However, any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools. This is because Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that education in government-funded schools be available, free of charge, to all Vargonian children regardless of the state of the economy, and that current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
The current student-teacher ratio at Vargonia's government-funded schools is higher than it was during the most recent period of economic recession.
During recent periods when the Vargonian economy has been strong, almost 25 percent of Vargonian children have attended privately funded schools, many of which charge substantial fees.
Nearly 20 percent more teachers are currently employed in Vargonia's government-funded schools than had been employed in those schools in the period before the last economic recession.
Teachers in Vargonia's government-funded schools are well paid relative to teachers in most privately funded schools in Vargonia, many of which rely heavily on part-time teachers.
During the last economic recession in Vargonia, the government permanently closed a number of the schools that it had funded.
经济衰退不会导致公立学校的教师职位的需求减少,因为v颁布了一个法律要求无论经济状况如何,公立学校对于v的孩子都免费,以及现在的师生比不能被超过。
果因推理:经济衰退教师职位不减少,因为学校免费且师生比不能被超过(学校免费学生变多,学生比老师的比例不上升,那么老师的数量也必然上升)
B. 经济好的时候,25%的孩子上私立学校,很多学校收大量的学费。—>那么经济不好的时候这些孩子就会选择公立学校,公立学校学生变多,和原文推理方向一致。但是这也太隐蔽了吧。。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论