In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic recession because many businesses cut back operations. However, any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools. This is because Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that education in government-funded schools be available, free of charge, to all Vargonian children regardless of the state of the economy, and that current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
The current student-teacher ratio at Vargonia's government-funded schools is higher than it was during the most recent period of economic recession.
During recent periods when the Vargonian economy has been strong, almost 25 percent of Vargonian children have attended privately funded schools, many of which charge substantial fees.
Nearly 20 percent more teachers are currently employed in Vargonia's government-funded schools than had been employed in those schools in the period before the last economic recession.
Teachers in Vargonia's government-funded schools are well paid relative to teachers in most privately funded schools in Vargonia, many of which rely heavily on part-time teachers.
During the last economic recession in Vargonia, the government permanently closed a number of the schools that it had funded.
1.DETAIL:错选C ,又返回去看了一遍题目文章有强调政府刚刚颁布的法律要件,而推论是这个刚刚发布的plan对未来的影响,和过去没有关系
2.Premise: 公立学校免费,大家都可去,师生比例不会降低
conclusion:公立学校教学岗位不会减少
GAP:公立学校免费大家都可以去 vs. 经济危机的时候确实会有更多的人去公立学校
答案方向:寻找加强支持经济危机时期学生确实会变多的选项
正确选项:在v地经济很好的时期,有25%的当地小孩子都上的私立学校,而且私利学校还特别贵。这里给了我们足够理由去认为等到经济不好的时候,25%孩子中至少会有一些去上公立学校,因为免费啊!!,从而确定了公立学校确实需要更多老师。加强了argument. (取反,如果在经济很好的时候,也没多少人上私立学校,那这个公立学校免费的规定也没什么用了,因为没办法吸引更多新学生去上了。所以给出了25%在上私立学校这个数据其实就是想点明目前上私立学校的学生还是很多的,那么意味着等下经济了有足够的人会去上公立)
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论