A significant number of complex repair jobs carried out by Ace Repairs have to be reworked under the company's warranty. The reworked jobs are invariably satisfactory. When initial repairs are inadequate, therefore, it is not because the mechanics lack competence; rather, there is clearly a level of focused concentration that complex repairs require that is elicited more reliably by rework jobs than by first-time jobs.
The argument above assumes which of the following?
There is no systematic difference in membership between the group of mechanics who do first-time jobs and the group of those who do rework jobs.
There is no company that successfully competes with Ace Repairs for complex repair jobs.
Ace Repairs' warranty is good on first-time jobs but does not cover rework jobs.
Ace Repairs does not in any way penalize mechanics who have worked on complex repair jobs that later had to be reworked.
There is no category of repair jobs in which Ace Repairs invariably carries out first-time jobs satisfactorily.
D选项: Ace Repairs does not in any way penalize mechanics who have worked on complex repair jobs that later had to be reworked.
公司不论怎样都不会惩罚那些一手活没干好的人。说明干一手活的人随意干也没事,但干二手活的人一定更专心吗?不一定,不支持~
取反:无论怎样公司都会惩罚一手活没干好的人,说明是即重干的活不是靠专注能解决的,削弱。
怪不得我选D,是不是选项错了?
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论