扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATLA-CR-7
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?
The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument's advocacy of a particular strategy.
The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.
E:the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed, 必须要更改的并不是situation
错因：作者针对的对象，句子关系
E人的目标；E人的办法，作者的观点（方法ILL-PERCIEVED）,原因一，原因二。
AB文中反对的是方法（purchase），而不是反对目标，都错
Ccan be attained并没有说明，而且作者认为方法不好，可以推出目标实现也困难
D首句的目标确实是大家都希望能达成的，作者不支持E的方法，2nd句提出不支持的原因，换句话就是 providing a basis for the argument's advocacy（ill-percieved） of a particular strategy.
E 以后也不一定要他们卖，想办法增加流动性
反对的是计划 而不是目标
第三遍错这道题了！唉 文章没有反对goal 而是反对strategy！第二个BD 是在为why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability. 提供evidence
Conclusion: a more sensible preservation strategy...
If you know this conclusion, you would not say that the goal of the environmental organization is "ill conceived." Pay attention to details: their first plan is ill-conceived, but not their goal.
For the second BF, it is a judgement "Someone will/will not do something." The author uses the 2nd BF to support his conclusion for a better strategy.
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-534739-1-1.html
文章没有反对goal，而是反对strategy
没有仔细审题！分清楚plan是在goal之后提出来的，跟着有两个结论。
一定要看清楚作者认为ill-conceived是plan而不是goal，且要把题目看完整，不要只看到第二个boldface就以为都看完了，其实后面还有要提出一个sensible preservation strategy，那么第二个boldface就不是结论，而是要为后面提出的strategy做支撑。
first bf is the overall goal. then they present two strategies to achieve the goal : buy the land /modernize
the second bf provides the basis
d. ("这里第一句说对了。就是一个goal，只不过有两种plan，1.是国家买 2.是农民继续使用，就是不给用作居民区的发展。第二句，说是对一个特别的策略的支持。也是对的，第二个bold face是plan2成立的基础。如果农民觉的土地是可以养活的就永远不会卖，这样的话，就不会用做居民区了。然后说了一下农业现代化和土地养活他们自己之间的关系。")
b. 1. the goal can be attained by 2nd strategy.
"That plan is ill-conceived"说明作者reject的是plan，而并不是goal
所以A错
E错误，第二个不是一个situation need to be changed, 而是一个judgement给接下来要提出的更好的一个strategy作铺垫
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-182993-1-1.html
上面的解析很好，一定看清楚 goal 和 plan 是不同的两样东西。goal - preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development从始至终没被反对，被反对的是买地的PLAN. 这一条一下就可以否定 ABCE。只有 D 说的最 deliberate。
via(通过)+(a)ble=viable"可通过的"可行的
The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing （主动提供）a basis for the argument's advocacy of a particular strategy.
argument没有反对goal而是反对第一个方案