People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, some of them quite serious. In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies. Based on this sample, experts conclude that among members of the general population who have spent a similarly large amount of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is not 30 percent but substantially more.
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for the experts' conclusion?
A zoo employee who develops a serious animal-induced allergy is very likely to switch to some other occupation.
A zoo employee is more likely than a person in the general population to keep one or more animal pets at home
The percentage of the general population whose level of exposure to animals matches that of a zoo employee is quite small.
Exposure to domestic pets is, on the whole, less likely to cause animal-induced allergy than exposure to many of the animals kept in zoos.
Zoo employees seldom wear protective gear when they handle animals in their care.
BCE全部无关,D反了
B:养宠物多和ALLERGY有毛关系,谁告诉你了?原文说了?
C : 暴露越多和ALLERGY有毛关系,谁告诉你了?原文说了?
D:比many animals in zoos低了,所以呢?然后呢?动物园可以就一头狮子,10种其他动物各1只,不能100人伺候一头狮子,狮子最过敏?这样的话是不是还是动物园里的人过敏比率高?
E:穿不穿防护服和ALLERGY有毛关系,谁告诉你了?原文说了?
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论