Scientists generally credit violent collisions between tectonic plates, the mobilefragments of Earth's rocky outer shell, with sculpting the planet's surface, as, for example, when what is now the Indian subcontinent collided with Asia, producing the Himalayan Mountains. However, plate tectonics cannot fully explain certain massive surface features, such as the "superswell" of southern Africa, a vast plateau over 1,000 miles across and nearly a mile high. Geologic evidence shows that southern African has been slowly rising for the past 100 million years, yet it has not experienced a tectonic collision for nearly 400 million years. The explanation may be in Earth's mantle, the layer of rock underlying the tectonic plates and extending down over 1,800 miles to the outer edge of Earth's iron core.
Since the early twentieth century, geophysicists have understood that the mantle churns and roils like a thick soup. The relative low density of the hottest rock makes that material buoyant, so it slowly ascends, while cooler, denser rock sinks until heat escaping the molten core warms it enough to make it rise again. While this process of convection was known to enable the horizontal movement of tectonic plates, until recently geophysicists were skeptical of its ability to lift or lower the planet's surface vertically. However, recent technological advances have allowed geophysicists to make three-dimensional "snapshots" of the mantle by measuring vibrations, or seismic waves, set in motion by earthquakes originating in the planet's outer shell and recording the time it takes for them to travel from an earthquake's epicenter to a particular recording station at the surface. Because geophysicists know that seismic waves become sluggish in hot, low-density rock, and speed up in colder, denser regions, they can now infer the temperatures and den- sities in a given segment of the interior. By compiling a map of seismic velocities from thousands of earthquakes across the globe, they can also begin to map temperatures and densities throughout the mantle. These methods have revealed some unexpectedly immense for- mations in the deepest parts of the mantle; the largest of these is a buoyant mass of hot rock directly below Africa's southern tip. Dispelling researchers' initial doubts, computer models have confirmed that this formation is buoyant enough to rise slowly within the mantle and strong enough to push Africa upward as it rises.
The passage is primarily concerned with
describing a traditional explanation for the vertical movement of Earth's surface
discussing recent geophysical research that may explain certain features of Earth's surface that were previously difficult to account for
combining elements of several theories in order to develop a plausible explanation for a poorly understood feature of Earth's surface
providing new evidence in support of a long-standing belief about how certain of Earth's massive surface features were created
questioning the implications of geophysicists' recent findings regarding the composition and density of Earth's mantle
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 B。
文章主要讨论了最近的地球物理学研究,可以解释以前很难解释的地球表面的某些特征,而不是关于传统解释地表垂直运动的内容、组合几个理论的元素以开发对一个不完全理解的地球表面特征的合理解释、提供有关如何创造地球的许多巨大表面特征的长期信念的新证据,或者质疑地球物理学家最近对地球地幔组成和密度的发现的含义。因此,正确答案是B,讨论最近的地球物理学研究可能解释以前很难解释的地球表面的某些特征。
错选D, 但其实并没有一个long-standing belief, 因为scientist的观念一直在change和question
sculpting 塑成
mantle 覆盖物
sniping 抨击
compiling 编织
buoyant 浮的
convection 回流
sluggish = sedentary 行动慢的
immense 巨大的
新老观念对比 必选B
我选了C,请问C错在哪了?
C: combining elements of several theories 结合不同的理论基础,不符合原文.
a long-standing belief长期存在的观点,意思是mantle引发了南非大陆的凸起物这歌解释是科学界的人一直都认同的,作者现在提供了新的证据去支持它。但实际是这个理论虽然存在,但until recently geophysicists were skeptical。
B,discussing recent geophysical research that may explain certain features of Earth's surface that were previously difficult to account for ,除没有 long-standing外,其他与C都一样。 recent geophysical research=C的new evidence,were previously difficult to account for对应原文的skeptical。
纠结在C,有人能解释一下C错在哪儿了么?
a plausible explanation 合理的解释