This passage was excerpted from material published in 1996.
When a large body strikes a planet or moon, material is ejected, thereby creating a hole in the planet and a local deficit of mass. This deficit shows up as a gravity anomaly: the removal of the material that has been ejected to make the hole results in an area of slightly lower gravity than surrounding areas. One would therefore expect that all of the large multi-ring impact basins on the surface of Earth's Moon would show such negative gravity anomalies, since they are, essentially, large holes in the lunar surface. Yet data collected in 1994 by the Clementine spacecraft show that many of these lunar basins have no anomalously low gravity and some even have anomalously high gravity.Scientists speculate that early in lunar history, when large impactors struck the Moon's surface, causing millions of cubic kilometers of crustal debris to be ejected, denser material from the Moon's mantle rose up beneath the impactors almost immediately, compensating for the ejected material and thus leaving no low gravity anomaly in the resulting basin. Later, however, as the Moon grew cooler and less elastic, rebound from large impactors would have been only partial and incomplete. Thus today such gravitational compensation probably would not occur: the outer layer of the Moon is too cold and stiff.
Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage?
An anomalous finding is cited, the data used to support that finding are analyzed, and the finding is modified.
A theory about a phenomenon is introduced, data seeming to disprove that theory are analyzed, and the theory is rejected.
A phenomenon is described, a finding relating to the phenomenon is discussed, and a possible explanation for that finding is offered.
A debate among scientists regarding the explanation for a particular phenomenon is outlined, and one position in that debate is shown to be more persuasive.
The observation of an astronomical event is described, and two schools of thought about the explanation for that event are discussed.
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 C。C 选项描述了文章的组织形式,文章开头描述了一个现象(一个大体积的物质撞击行星或卫星会产生一个孔,以及相应的重力异常),然后介绍了支持这一发现的数据,最后提出了一种可能的解释(月球早期热度高而且弹性很好,所以撞击时容易出现现象的补偿,但是现在月球表层已经很冷,因此发生的补偿可能比较少)。
paradox题,scientists提出explanation结局矛盾,而非反驳任何一方。
通过上面的一个脉络,可以知道文章并没有在diss前面的expect,科学家只是在解读数据而已。C选项,A phenomenon is described,这里的现象就是“在星球表面坑的重力异常现象”;A finding relating to that phenomenon is discussed,这个finding就是data;a possible explanation FOR THAT FINDING is offered,没错,科学家就是在对这个发现(data)进行解读。
A. the finding is modified.错误
B. theory is rejected错误
C正确
D. 没有debate
E. 没有two schools of thought
文章没说theory 就不要选theory
错选B,然而文中并没有reject之前的理论,没有出现明显的负面词汇。只是拿月球来举一个特例。a finding relating to the phenomenon
错选B。如果是文章主要是一个reject的话,通常都会有非常明显的负面词,而文章的脉络大概是——有一个重力异常现象在星球表面的坑==月球也有坑,所以one would expect月球上的坑也会这样==YET一个数据发现月球的坑不但不是低重力甚至还是高重力==科学家对这个数据进行推测解读==认为是月球自己的compensation,现在没了因为月球现在很冷而且很硬