For many years, historians thought that the development of capitalism had not faced serious challenges in the United States. Writing in the early twentieth century, Progressive historians sympathized with the battles waged by farmers and small producers against large capitalists in the late nineteenth century, but they did not question the widespread acceptance of laissez-faire (unregulated) capitalism throughout American history. Similarly, Louis Hartz, who sometimes disagreed with the Progressives, argued that Americans accepted laissez-faire capitalism without challenge because they lacked a feudal, precapitalist past. Recently, however, some scholars have argued that even though laissez-faire became the prevailing ethos in nineteenth century America, it was not accepted without struggle. Laissez-faire capitalism, they suggest, clashed with existing religious and communitarian norms that imposed moral constraints on acquisitiveness to protect the weak from the predatory, the strong from corruption, and the entire culture from materialist excess. Buttressed by mercantilist notions that government should be both regulator and promoter of economic activity, these norms persisted long after the American Revolution helped unleash the economic forces that produced capitalism. These scholars argue that even in the late nineteenth century, with the government's role in the economy considerably diminished, laissez-faire had not triumphed completely. Hard times continued to revive popular demands for regulating business and softening the harsh edges of laissez-faire capitalism.
The passage suggests that the scholars mentioned in the first highlight portion of text would agree with which of the following statements regarding the "norms" mentioned in the second highlighted portion of text?
They provided a primary source of opposition to the development of laissez-faire capitalism in the United States in the nineteenth century.
Their appeal was undermined by difficult economic times in the United States at the end of the nineteenth century
They disappeared in the United States in the late nineteenth century because of the triumph of laissez-faire capitalism.
They facilitated the successful implementation of mercantilist notions of government in the United States in the nineteenth century
They are now recognized by historians as having been an important part of the ideology of the American Revolution.
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案:A。
这个答案是正确的,因为文章提到,一些学者认为,即使在19世纪末,政府对经济的作用大大减少,自由主义仍然没有完全得到胜利。道德规范持续存在,增强贸易观念,即政府应该同时充当监管者和经济推动者的角色,这些观念帮助反对自由主义的发展。因此,正确答案是A,即这些道德规范提供了19世纪美国自由主义发展的主要对抗力量。
D. 是这些norms受到了mercantilist notions的支持,而不是norms帮助贯彻了mercantilist notions,故错误
文中说得是 norms were buttressed by mercantilist notions ,两个对象搞反了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
RON: laissez-faire... was not accepted without struggle. Laissez-faire capitalism ...clashed with... norms
LZ met with resistance from these social "norms" before it became predominant所以A選項 norms provided a primary source of opposition to the development of laissez-faire
scholar 怎么认为norm的,记住这一点。只看文中提及scholar argue的部分,其余的都不是scholar的看法
“RON: laissez-faire... was not accepted without struggle. Laissez-faire capitalism ...clashed with... norms
LZ met with resistance from these social "norms" before it became predominant所以A選項 norms provided a primary source of opposition to the development of laissez-faire”
clashed with 与……冲突
D錯誤是他們的關係reverse了: They (norms) facilitated the successful implementation of mercantilist notions of government -> norms 促進了商人的notions實施, 商人notion就是文中提及的: 'government should be both regulator and promoter of economic activity', 根據原文, norms 是被mercantilist notions支持 (buttressed) = facilitated , 而不是 norms facilitated mercantilist notions
“clashed” with existing religious and communitarian norms 。注意clash这个词
说的是notions支持norms,norms在美国革命解除对资本主义的限制后仍然存在着。
不能推出norms促进了对资本主义的限制,不能推出norms促进了notions--》只是说了norms在A消失后还存在,不能推出是norm引起了A的存在,逻辑!你脑补太多了。
primary,主要的,最初的,并不必然指首要的,最重要的。
However,一开始讲资本主义与宗教和社区文化相冲突,再讲商人信念希望加强政府监管职能与资本主义的冲突,是3个不同的东西。
Laissez-faire capitalism, they suggest, clashed with existing religious and communitarian norms that imposed moral constraints on acquisitiveness to protect the weak from the predatory, the strong from corruption, and the entire culture from materialist excess.
communitarian notion(反对自由资本主义) 和merchant notion(支持自由资本主义)是相反的,所以D不对。文章里这些学者提出反对自由资本主义的例子,所以A对
定位句:Laissez-faire capitalism, they suggest, clashed with existing religious and communitarian norms that imposed moral constraints on acquisitiveness to protect the weak from the predatory...思路:提出这个的学者会同意哪个依他们所说norms的观点---其实Laissez-faire C没有发展的那么顺(说明有反对的声音)---选项里只有A明确指出了opposition to
Laissez-faire capitalism, they suggest, clashed with(与之冲突) existing religious and communitarian norms that imposed moral constraints on acquisitiveness to protect the weak from the predatory, the strong from corruption, and the entire culture from materialist excess.
Recently, however, some scholars have argued that even though laissez-faire became the prevailing ethos in nineteenth century America, it was not accepted without struggle. Laissez-faire capitalism, they suggest, clashed with existing religious and communitarian NORMS that imposed moral constraints on acquisitiveness to protect the weak from the predatory, the strong from corruption, and the entire culture from materialist excess. 这个社会标准和 l-f capitalism是clashed,冲突的
BUG,文章没有对应的highlight