This passage was adapted from an article written in 1990.
Research data indicate that there is a great deal of poverty in the United States among single-parent families headed by women. This problem could result from the fact that women's wages are only 60 percent of men's. Some economists believe that rigorous enforcement of existing equal pay laws would substantially decrease this wage inequity. But equal pay laws are ineffectual when women and men are concentrated in different occupations because such laws require only that women and men doing the same jobs be paid the same. Since gender concentration exists (for example, 80 percent of clerical workers are women), other economists argue that a comparable worth standard, which would mandate that women and men in any jobs that require comparable training and responsibility be paid the same, should be applied instead. But some policy analysts assert that, although comparable worth would virtually equalize male and female wages, many single-parent families headed by women would remain in poverty because many men earn wages that are below the poverty line. These policy analysts believe that the problem is not caused primarily by wage inequity but rather by low wages coupled with single parenthood, regardless of sex. As a solution, they challenge the government's assumption that a family's income should depend primarily on wages and urge the government to provide generous wage supplements (child and housing allowances) to single parents whose wages are low.
The passage suggests that the United States government's policy towards providing wage supplements to parents whose wages are low is
considered ill advised by most economists who have studied the issue
based on assumptions about the appropriate sources of family income
under revision in response to criticism from some policy analysts
capable of eliminating wage inequality but not of raising incomes for both women and men
applicable to single-parent families headed by women but not to single-parent families headed by men
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案为 B。因为文章提到,一些政策分析家声称,虽然可以通过采用"可比较价值标准"来消除男女之间的工资不平等,但是很多由女性领头的单亲家庭仍然处在贫困之中,原因在于许多男性的工资低于贫困线。这些政策分析家认为,问题的主要原因不是工资的不平等,而是低工资加上单身家庭这一组合,而不管性别如何。作为解决方案,他们质疑政府假定家庭收入应该主要依靠工资,并敦促政府为低工资的单亲家庭提供慷慨的工资补贴、儿童和住房津贴。因此,正确答案是B,因为文章暗示,美国政府对提供工资补贴给低工资家庭的政策是基于对家庭收入来源的假设。
题目问的:美国政府对于工资很低的父母的政策如何
A:some economist并没有明确说这个plan是有问题的;
B:原文 they challenge the government's assumption that a family's income should depend primarily on wages;同位语从句说明assumption是如何,可以选;
C:并没有说under revision,不能选;
depend 〖primarily〗 on wages 是❌assumption,正确assumption就是〖appropriate〗income。。。取非套路