In most earthquakes the Earth's crust cracks like porcelain, Stress builds up until a fracture forms at a line depth of a few kilometers and the crust slips to relieve the stress. Some earthquakes, however, take place hundreds of kilometers down in the Earth's mantle, where high pressure makes rock so ductile that it flows instead of cracking, even under stress severe enough to deform it like putty. How can there be earthquakes at such depths?
That such deep events do occur has been accepted only since 1927. when the seismologist Kiyoo Wadati convincingly demonstrated their existence. Instead of comparing the arrival times of seismic waves at different locations, as earlier researchers had done, Wadati relied on a time difference between the arrival of primary(P) waves and the slower secondary(S) waves. Because P and S waves travel at different but fairly constant speeds, the interval between their arrivals increases in proportion to the distance from the earthquake focus, or initial rupture point.
For most earthquakes, wadati discovered, the interval was quite short near the epicenter; the point on the surface where shaking is strongest. For a few events, however, the delay was long even at the epicenter. Wadati saw a similar pattern when he analyzed data on the intensity of shaking. Most earthquakes had a small area of intense shaking, which weakened rapidly with increasing distance from the epicenter. but others were characterized by a lower peak intensity, felt over a broader area. Both the P-S intervals and the intensity patterns suggested two kinds of earthquakes: the more common shallow events, in which the focus lay just under the epicenter, and deep events, with a focus several hundred kilometers down.
The question remained: how can such quakes occur, given that mantle rock at a depth of more than 50 kilometers is too ductile to store enough stress to fracture? Wadati's work suggested that deep events occur in areas (now called Wadati-Benioff zones) where one crustal plate is forced under another and descends into the mantle. The descending rock is substantially cooler than the surrounding mantle and hence is less ductile and much more liable to fracture.
It can be inferred from the passage that if the S waves from an earthquake arrive at a given location long after the P waves, which of the following must be true?
The earthquake was a deep event.
The earthquake was a shallow event.
The earthquake focus was distant.
The earthquake focus was nearby.
The earthquake had a low peak intensity.
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 A。因为文章指出,通常情况下S波在近似心位置上到达的时间很短,如果地震事件有一大延迟,说明这个地震是一个深度地震,由于它发生在地球mantle的深处,在这里岩石太韧性而不能破裂,所以这种地震必须发生在华氏本奥夫动力带,即Wadati-Benioff zones ,这些带区时可能使一个地壳板块推动另一个板块在地幔上深处。因此,A选项是正确的答案,因为它指出地震是一个深度地震。
应该就是选A吧
仔细研究了一下
首先,第一段认为deep event不可能,但是W肯定了它的存在,他的方法和别人不一样,他是通过PS的interval判断了deep event的存在
而后一段说most的地震,都是靠近震中间隔就比较短,但是也有例外,靠近震中但是也可以long
由此可见delay的长短无法判断其于震中的距离
别的网站上看的答案是C
间隔长必定距离远,但是有可能是水平距离的远,或者是垂直距离的远(deep),所以A不对
同觉得c
根据倒数第二段,说了一堆,我们还是不知道能不能只通过ps判断,还是不知道有没有distant 的但是shallow 的
文章说deep 的focus是地下多少多少千米
我觉得deep 必然distant ,distant 未必deep
参考答案:问的是如果PS时间很长,一定是什么样的地震?而不是问什么样的地震PS时间很长?
close to focus有些这样的地震也可以有长时间PS,所以C错。如果是第二种问法,那么C是正确的,离focus远的PS时间一定长。
但PS时间长一定是deep的地震,不管你离focus近还是远。shallow的地震PS一定是短的。所以A正确。
这题很狡猾,要看清楚题目问题和假设关系。
C is the correct answer.
这题好像蛮多争议啊.......
deep event和distant都有定位——
deep event——For a few events, however, the delay was long even at the epicenter.
distant——the interval between their arrivals increases in proportion to the distance from the earthquake focus, or rupture point.
C
文字不够,接一下 , 上面long after也侧面反映了,波及范围广,不管是距离震点中心多高(深)还是多远,都是deep event的特点—波及范围广。shallow由于快速消弱往往跑不远。 感觉这道题真的好难,很绕。如果考试我希望自己想都不想直接放弃,不要浪费时间。
大部分地震距离震中越近,ps间隔越短。 但是有些例外,距离震中够近了,间隔也很慢。然后 Wadati 又saw a similar pattern when he analyzed data on the intensity of shaking. 这里说相似的pattern 。 大部分地震波及范围小,而且随着远离震中迅速消弱。还有一部分,没有前者强,(相对弱),波及范围广。 这里前后对应了,为什么呢? 作者给了答案Both the P-S intervals and the intensity patterns suggested这两个现象说明:地震有两种,一种shallow ,浅层的,特点是范围小迅速弱化,震强。 一种是deep ,深层。 特点是震弱些,范围广 。好了。这里 b 肯定不对,long after 肯定不是远就是深不一定是shallow C排除,可能是深。D 更不对。E 有意思的来了,low intensity , 人家说的是比前者弱,不代表就是弱,万一不够很深,比最厉害的shallow稍微弱一点呢?
直接定位原文Because P and S waves travel at different but fairly constant speeds, the interval between their arrivals increases in proportion to the distance from the earthquake focus, or initial rupture point.
很明显可以看出,S和P的关系也就是interval和distance有关。
我也觉得是c
这道题应该选C吧 我看其他网站上答案是C