Prior to 1965 geologists assumed that the two giant rock plates meeting at the San Andreas Fault generate heat through friction as they grind past each other, but in 1965 Henyey found that temperatures in drill holes near the fault were not as elevated as had been expected. Some geologists wondered whether the absence of friction-generated heat could be explained by the kinds of rock composing the fault. Geologists' pre-1965 assumptions concerning heat generated in the fault were based on calculations about common varieties of rocks, such as limestone and granite; but "weaker" materials, such as clays, had already been identified in samples retrieved from the fault zone. Under normal conditions, rocks composed of clay produce far less friction than do other rock types.
In 1992 Byerlee tested whether these materials would produce friction 10 to 15 kilometers below the Earth's surface. Byerlee found that when clay samples were subjected to the thousands of atmospheres of pressure they would encounter deep inside the Earth, they produced as much friction as was produced by other rock types. The harder rocks push against each other, the hotter they become; in other words, pressure itself, not only the rocks' properties, affects frictional heating. Geologists therefore wondered whether the friction between the plates was being reduced by pockets of pressurized water within the fault that push the plates away from each other.
The passage is primarily concerned with
evaluating a method used to test a particular scientific hypothesis
discussing explanations for an unexpected scientific finding
examining the assumptions underlying a particular experiment
questioning the validity of a scientific finding
presenting evidence to support a recent scientific hypothesis
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 B。 这篇文章主要是讨论1965 年亨尼发现的在圣安德烈亚断层区钻孔中温度不如预期的惊人发现,以及这一发现造成的一些科学家的怀疑。文章讨论了科学家们用来解释这一发现的各种理论,例如空气和泥浆等软物质可能在断层中减少摩擦产生的热量。因此,正确的答案是B
错选c,重点应该是第一句话的后半段,全文都是围绕H的发现展开的
错选C。but in 1965 Henyey found that temperatures in drill holes near the fault were not as elevated as had been expected.只能用这一句来推测这些finding是unexpected的。如果有更加好的解答ball各位大神提出解析
Hi 我也错选了C。现在看来,我的理解是并没有任何underlying particular experiment , 且H的finding就是unexpected finding。且第二段只是在之前的基础上衍生到pressure也会对friction发热有影响。Main idea还是在第一段的。
in other words, pressure itself, not only the rocks' properties, affects frictional heating.
注意这句写的not only
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
错选C,其实并没有experiement,全文都是在解释一开始提出的一个现象。
选了C,错因是没找到围绕全文展开论述的话:
1965年前科学家认为板块运动是摩擦生热,且假设材质不同,摩擦不同
1965年,but in 1965 Henyey found that temperatures in drill holes near the fault were not as elevated as had been expected,(注意这里的时间是1965年,)
1992年有一个test发现压力也会影响摩擦生热,但最终的关系科学家们还在wonder
因此总体来看,是H的发现引起了全文的论述,而不是1992的test
全文对Henyer的finding为什么和之前的理论不一致进行解释
A. 评价试验方法,没有评价试验的方法
B. 讨论对一个没有想到的发现的解释
C.全文只有对压力测试的实验,对这个实验的假设进行检测,以偏概全,不是主要目的,主要目的是为了解释Henyer的finding
D.质疑finding的有效性,没有质疑这个finding
E. 对最近的一个科学假设提供证据,最后都没得出具体的结论,就算是有提供证据也不是行文的主要目的
问文章的主要目的,作者行文使用的都是各个科学家对于finding的解释和介绍科学家的发现,作者自己并未提出什么证据或者supporting
AE不对,直接看动词和最后一个词组成意思就能发现不对
C:“检验一个实验的潜在推测”,文中只有一个关于泥土的实验,其结论“压力水减少莫测”并没有被检测; 如果钻洞是另一个实验,检验钻洞的推论,只是文章中部的一部分内容
D: 对实验的真实性没有质疑过;实验都是真实的,只是实验推翻了之前的推论
错选A,全文并没有评估Byerlee的试验方法
文中第一段句末说normal condition,正常情况下是岩石类型不同,但是1992年发现并不是那个原因,而是深度不同。所以是unexpected
examining 需要对结果发出态度,而文中直接就结果指向了接下来的方向