In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad economic recession has included a business downturn in the clothing trade, where sales are down by about 7 percent as compared to two years ago. Clothing wholesalers have found, however, that the proportion of credit extended to retailers that was paid off on time fell sharply in the first year of the recession but returned to its prerecession level in the second year.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the change between the first and the second year of the recession in the proportion of credit not paid off on time?
The total amount of credit extended to retailers by clothing wholesalers increased between the first year of the recession and the second year.
Between the first and second years of the recession, clothing retailers in Veltria saw many of their costs, rent and utilities in particular, increase.
Of the considerable number of clothing retailers in Veltria who were having financial difficulties before the start of the recession, virtually all were forced to go out of business during its first year.
Clothing retailers in Veltria attempted to stimulate sales in the second year of the recession by discounting merchandise.
Relatively recession-proof segments of the clothing trade, such as work clothes, did not suffer any decrease in sales during the first year of the recession.
情景:在Veltria,过去两年经济萧条,其中服装行业的销售额跟两年前相比下降了7%。服装批发商发现,零售商贷款按时还清的比例,在萧条的第一年下降,第二年恢复到萧条前水平。
推理:推理文段属于“相似推导相似”型,即,第一年和第二年因为都经济萧条,所以两个年份的零售商贷款按时还清的比例理应相同,推理文段为类比推理。
选题方式:类比推理一共具有两个评估方向,简而言之,即,要么提到“第一年”或“第二年,要么给出与这两个案例相平行等价的案例C。
选项分析:
A选项:两年之间,批发商贷给零售商的总贷款增加。虽然给出了类比对象的不同点,但是总贷款增加可能反而会使得还清比例更低。
B选项:两年之间,零售商发现自己的租金和用品成本增加。虽然给出了类比对象的不同点,但是成本增加应该会导致还清比例更低。
C选项:Correct. 萧条前就有财务困难的零售商,在萧条的第一年全部破产。本选项可以解释为什么第二年的还清比例高,因为第一年还不起就都死了。属于CQ1:相似性问题。
D选项:萧条的第二年,零售商打折促销。本选项给出的是零售商们怎么卖货,和还贷款无关。
E选项:对萧条有抵抗力的服装贸易,比如工作服装,在萧条的第一年销售未减少。本选项没有提到类比对象的区别。
工作才知道, 申请破产了, 就会被清算, 可以不用还钱了. 这是为什么会有申请破产...
一家企业破产了, 只会被清算, 法人和股东被清算, 但是能不能偿还所有的, 其实无所谓了
错选D,(没有理解题目意思)
幸存者偏差。
credit在这里是贷款的意思。 选项认真读不要脑补。 C: virtually all were forced to go out of business during its first year 是破产了而不是出去找新的商业机会。。。读成了go out looking for business...
优胜劣汰 剩下都是好的了
我觉得这道题最关键的是认清“直接原因”。 选项A和选项B虽然都是对比,但是租金,用品成本的改变,总贷款的变化,都不是能导致还贷款变化的直接原因。直接原因:百分之百导致结果发生的原因。一条逻辑链里离结果最近的那个因素才是直接原因。
选的D 当时想的。。。促销多挣钱 就能还上了。。。
老师这个类比推理解释,真的是醍醐灌顶
我觉得关键是C选项的【attempt to】吧,选项只是说尝试通过打折提高sale,但是没说一定能成功。【成功了--->还得起】才是我们脑补出来的。
D为什么不对啊?打折卖出商品,然后去还贷呀。。。。难道说打折卖还亏了不能还贷。。。那也想太多了吧。。。。。。
因为题目前半段说了sales变少了。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
其实c和d都是类比对象的不同点,只是c和还贷款的联系比d更加直接
卖了才有钱还啊。第一年破产滚出去的难道就不用还钱了,不还得包含在这proportion里
proportion比例,并不是数量。不选C的原因是因为认为零售商的数量是一个恒定的一个值,第一年还不起就死了,但仍然算在整体的数值当中,第一年的比例延续到了第二年,而选D则是因为零售商打折促销,就会卖更多的货物,就会有更多的钱还款,所以第二年比例就提高了,但这一切都是自己臆想出来的。。。不能考虑这些!
这是照这么说,C选项不也是臆想出来的吗…
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
类比/枚举推理。