扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / OG2016-SC-55
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering
Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ended shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber
Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and that ends shortly before Emily's death in 1886 and outnumbering
Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother, ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, and outnumbering
Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber
题目分析：
本题和第719题很像。考查的重点也几乎相同。
选项分析：
A选项：现在分词短语outnumbering her letters to anyone else是伴随状语。其逻辑主语为Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson。依图形背景原则，ED是在给SHD写信的过程中超过给其他人的信的（不可能写第一封信的时候就超过了给别人信的数量），因此，写信应为背景，“在数量上超过”应为图形。
B选项：句子Dickinson were written over a period和句子outnumber her letters to anyone else间缺少连词，逗号是不能连接两个句子的。
C选项：本选项没有谓语动词。
D选项：本选项没有谓语动词。
E选项：Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
B选项的应该不是缺少连接词吧。。。 一个限制性定语从句中由and连接的并列的动词begins 和ended的时态不一致。。。如果错了请偶像轻拍。。。
一万吨拍。是were written这句话和outnumber这句话之间缺少连词。and连接的是begin和end，不是同一层次的成分。
一万吨？拍。。。嗯，明白了，GMAT里任何两个独立的句子都不能用“，”连接，需要用and, but, for，yet之类的连接，或者是分号加therefore什么的。重新来过，二刷回来做题，tons of tears :)
“，”不可以在没有连词的情况下连接两个独立的句子，这点明白了。
但是句中的begin和end为什么不是一个层次的呢？这两个不都是修饰period的定语吗？
而且正确选项中begin和end的时态也是一样的。即， period beginning a few years ... and (period) ending...
如果错了请偶像轻拍...
begin和end是同一层次的没错，但是它们都是letters的定语。它们俩和write, outnumber不是同一层次的。
所以，B选项中的【that begins】和【ended】都是【letters】的定语，功能平行，不要求时态一致，对吗？
语法上的确是没问题，但是在逻辑上，begin和end这两个动作在这道题目中应该是时态相同吧，至少begin不能是一般现在时。
回来再看这道题，发现之前关注的地方都不是考点。。。确实感觉到进步了。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论