In current historiography, the picture of a consistent, unequivocal decline in women's status with the advent of capitalism and industrialization is giving way to an analysis that not only emphasizes both change (whether improvement or decline) and continuity but also accounts for geographical and occupational variation.
The history of women's work in English farmhouse cheese making between 1800 and 1930 is a case in point. In her influential Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution (1930), Pinchbeck argued that the agricultural revolution of the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, with its attendant specialization and enlarged scale of operation, curtailed women's participation in the business of cheese production. Earlier, she maintained, women had concerned themselves with feeding cows, rearing calves, and even selling the cheese in local markets and fairs. Pinchbeck thought that the advent of specialization meant that women's work in cheese dairying was reduced simply to processing the milk. "Dairymen" (a new social category) raised and fed cows and sold the cheese through factors, who were also men. With this narrowing of the scope of work, Pinchbeck believed, women lost business ability, independence, and initiative.
Though Pinchbeck portrayed precapitalist, preindustrial conditions as superior to what followed, recent scholarship has seriously questioned the notion of a golden age for women in precapitalist society. For example, scholars note that women's control seldom extended to the disposal of the proceeds of their work. In the case of cheese, the rise of factors may have compromised women's ability to market cheese at fairs. But merely selling the cheese did not necessarily imply access to the money: Davidoff cites the case of an Essex man who appropriated all but a fraction of the money from his wife's cheese sales.
By focusing on somewhat peripheral operations, moreover, Pinchbeck missed a substantial element of continuity in women's participation: throughout the period women did the central work of actually making cheese. Their persistence in English cheese dairying contrasts with women's early disappearance from arable agriculture in southeast England and from American cheese dairying. Comparing these three divergent developments yields some reasons for the differences among them. English cheesemaking women worked in a setting in which cultural values, agricultural conditions, and the nature of their work combined to support their continued participation. In the other cases, one or more of these elements was lacking.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
present recently discovered evidence that supports a conventional interpretation of a historical period
describe how reinterpretations of available evidence have reinvigorated a once discredited scholarly position
explain why some historians have tended to emphasize change rather than continuity in discussing a particular period
explore how changes in a particular occupation serve to counter the prevailing view of a historical period
examine a particular area of historical research in order to exemplify a general scholarly trend
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 E. examine a particular area of historical research in order to exemplify a general scholarly trend。
这篇文章的主要目的是探索一个特别的历史研究领域,以说明一般学术趋势。文章开头就讨论了当前历史史学对资本主义和工业化所带来妇女地位的一致否定性下降描绘有所变化,即改善或衰退以及连续性的分析。文章随后探讨了1800到1930年间英国农场奶酪制作中妇女劳动力的历史,以此来说明这一一般学术趋势。文章指出,奶酪制作业妇女的参与始终如一,但是她们无法控制收入;文中比较了三种不同的发展,从而提出了它们之间的差异。总之,文章的主要目的是探究一个特别的历史研究领域,以说明一般学术趋势,因此正确答案是 E. examine a particular area of historical research in order to exemplify a general scholarly trend。
counter反击
选了B因为没有充分理解“describe how reinterpretations of available evidence have reinvigorated a once discredited scholarly position” 的意思。它是在说通过重新解读振兴了曾经不被信赖的研究结论。
可事实上文章的主题是通过分析结构曾经风靡结论中的漏洞来否定它,且阐述看待这类问题的新趋势。bd从逻辑上实际是相反的。
E才是正确答案。
这篇文章有靠谱的翻译吗
又错又错好气啊;第三次错了 DE纠结,错选了D
以后做主旨题,一定要看首段 各段首末句了,提高正确率
我主旨题还是做的这么差
大意,看哪个说的大,hold住啊
这个答案基本上就是第一段话的改写。第一段话基本上就说了老观点代替新观点。然后后面就开始长篇大论用 PB 书中的例子阐述。