A surge in new home sales and a drop in weekly unemployment claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought.
claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought
claims suggests that the economy might not be so weak as some analysts have previously thought
claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought by some analysts
claims, suggesting about the economy that it might not be so weak as previously thought by some analysts
claims, suggesting the economy might not be as weak as previously thought to be by some analysts
题目分析:
本题的主语很容易被误认为是a surge。仔细观察可知,claim的主语不仅是a surge还有and之后的a drop,即,suggest的真正主语为a surge and a drop。另外,很多读者可能会把claims看作动词,从而不理解为什么claims身后还有一个动词suggest。实际上,claims是一个固定用法,unemployment claims指因失业而提出“某人已失业,请求失业救济”,是一种失业救济程序。而new home sales也是一个固定表达,与existing home sales相对应,是指新房销售,existing home sales指的是成品房销售。全句大意是说,新房销售量的上升和周失业救济申请的下降表明经济并没有原来预测的那么糟。
选项分析:
A选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
B选项:a surge and a drop是复数,所以其谓语动词也必须是复数,即,suggest;some analysts have previously thought应该用过去时,而不是现在完成时,这是因为,经济的强弱肯定是和之前分析师认为的相比较,而不是和分析师到现在为止认为的相比较(到现在,分析师应该也能看到新房销售量的上升和周失业救济申请的下降了,自然地,他们也不会继续认为经济疲软。由此可知,只能是经济和之前分析师的预期相比)。
C选项:thought时态错误同(B)。
D选项:本选项没有谓语动词。
E选项:本选项没有谓语动词。
c选项还有一个问题就是 have been previously thought by some analysts的主语在选项中是economy,那么就祝胃不一致了
——句意——
the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously "thought" vs the economy might not be so weak as some analysts "have previously thought"
显然,句意为没有”之前预期的“那么差,而不是没有”从过去某个时间一直到现在预期的“那么差
C选项:时态错误最后来看,我们看as weak as省略了什么
might not be as weak as (the economy) have(?) been previously thought by some analysts
?这里再怎么也应该是has been 而不是have been
DE用逗号隔开之后用,就是俩clauses 没有动词排除,然后B是主谓一致排除
C跟老师说的一样,应该是跟以前的想法对比而不是一直到现在的想法对比
previously 往前推一个时态没错,可主句是一般现在时
relative jugements:
CE:as (thought to be/have been thought) by VS as thought by
CDE:“as thought by some analysts” VS “as some analysts thought”
一些bossy words可以用在non bossy ways
Right: Her presence suggests that she is happy.
Right: We suggest that he be promoted.(subjunctive)
Right: His artwork suggests great talent.
unemployment claims失业索赔
c选项 as后面的成分(the economy)have been thoughy by… 主谓不一致
老师,A选项的比较,是省略了Be动词嘛?some analysts previously thought the economy was weak?
主谓一致:排除B选项;
C选项:have been previous thought by...时态不合适;
D选项:没有谓语动词;
E选项:没谓语动词
完成时的句子在翻译上应该加入“已经”
现在完成时 就是 主语已经怎样了。如题C,翻译为已经所想就很奇怪。
同理,
过去完成时 就是加入 主语在XXX时间已经。
尝试利用这个方法去对比句子意思应该可以判断什么时候用一般式,什么时候用完成时。
so...as...是正确的用法吗?能否作为一个知识点去排除?
栽到C上了,have 改成 has
C选项:as well as 是平行结构的标志词,前后时态平行
谓语动词suggest前面的两个由and连接的两个成分是主语,所以谓语动词用suggest原型,留下A和C选项,BC选项时态有问题,有主动不用被动的原则;DE选项无谓语动词
补充C的另一个绝对错误
the economy might not be as weak
as economy have been previously thought by some analysts -as后面是done结构,不平行
排除B的根本原因是have主谓不一致,主语是economy不能用have,被动确实不好,句子也不够简洁。
E选项的suggesting不是谓语动词吗....
不是,是状语
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
C选项-A surge in new home sales and a drop in weekly unemployment claims suggest
that the economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought by some analysts
that从句还原后the economy might not be as weak as economy have been previously thought by some analysts
have应用has
同意,great job~
这个have thought不是analysts的谓语动词吗?
不是啊 这是done结构
恩恩,知道了
我觉得就算是has也不对吧,因为它只是说analysts之前预测的,单用一般过去时就可以了
good job
反正have是肯定不对的可以排除了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论