A surge in new home sales and a drop in weekly unemployment claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought.
claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought
claims suggests that the economy might not be so weak as some analysts have previously thought
claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought by some analysts
claims, suggesting about the economy that it might not be so weak as previously thought by some analysts
claims, suggesting the economy might not be as weak as previously thought to be by some analysts
题目分析:
本题的主语很容易被误认为是a surge。仔细观察可知,claim的主语不仅是a surge还有and之后的a drop,即,suggest的真正主语为a surge and a drop。另外,很多读者可能会把claims看作动词,从而不理解为什么claims身后还有一个动词suggest。实际上,claims是一个固定用法,unemployment claims指因失业而提出“某人已失业,请求失业救济”,是一种失业救济程序。而new home sales也是一个固定表达,与existing home sales相对应,是指新房销售,existing home sales指的是成品房销售。全句大意是说,新房销售量的上升和周失业救济申请的下降表明经济并没有原来预测的那么糟。
选项分析:
A选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
B选项:a surge and a drop是复数,所以其谓语动词也必须是复数,即,suggest;some analysts have previously thought应该用过去时,而不是现在完成时,这是因为,经济的强弱肯定是和之前分析师认为的相比较,而不是和分析师到现在为止认为的相比较(到现在,分析师应该也能看到新房销售量的上升和周失业救济申请的下降了,自然地,他们也不会继续认为经济疲软。由此可知,只能是经济和之前分析师的预期相比)。
C选项:thought时态错误同(B)。
D选项:本选项没有谓语动词。
E选项:本选项没有谓语动词。
在AC当中纠结,最后排除C选项的原因是C中的逻辑主语是BY 后面的 analysts, 比较的对象就变成了现在的economy和 analysts have thought 的 economy进行了比较,在逻辑上面说不通。因为have thought 是一个只有起点没有终点的时间观点,对现在有影响,因而无法进行比较。
A选项还原后变成the economy might not be as weak as the economy that some analysts previously thought be. 请问老师,这样的还原对吗?
the economy might not be as weak as the economy that some analysts previously thought
economy是thought的宾语
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
不应该是as weak as what analyst thouhgt of 吗 如果不是这样的话,省略的是什么
问not。。。so as
unemployment claims原来是个名词
as ...as 也能用于否定句吗
C答案的关键不是时态,而是have been previously thought 前面省略的the economy,那么the economy have been...就明显错了。
毕老师,new home sales 应该是”新屋销量”的意思
解析已更新,感谢指正。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
some analysts previously thought之前是不是省略了the economy?不然总觉得怪怪的...
不只是省略economy,是省略了整个句子,变成了比较一个情况,和之前的情况。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
根于OG上的解释,C选项有个好理解的方法排除have been,就是have没有复数词当它主语~
anylysts 不是复数主语吗
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
所以否定的时候也不一定会用so ··· as,吗
能不能认为previously只能用过去时呢
A 选项还原后是 A surge in new home sales and a drop in weekly unemployment claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as the economy that some analysts previously thought.
谓语动词单复数不是和就近的那个主语一致吗?都是a不是应该用单数嘛?
哪看的这种荒谬言论啊...
晕,难道不是啊,雅思老师说滴
我想,雅思老师的原话肯定不是这么说的(我猜你雅思老师应该说的是there be句型吧)。如果她原话是这么说的,那建议你去砍她。
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
同问not so ...as...
解析已更新。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
As. As 在否定句里可以说成是not. So. As. 啊
解析已更新。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
A
B 语法错误,claims suggest;
C ;
D as…as固定搭配;
E 无谓语动词