Researchers studying the brain scans of volunteers who pondered ethical dilemmas have found that the basis for making tough moral judgments is emotion, not logic or analytical reasoning.
the brain scans of volunteers who pondered ethical dilemmas have found that the basis for making tough moral judgments is
the brain scans of volunteers who pondered ethical dilemmas and found the basis to make tough moral decisions to be
the brain scans of volunteers pondering ethical dilemmas and found that the basis for making tough moral decisions is
volunteers' brain scans while pondering ethical dilemmas have found the basis to make tough moral judgments to be
volunteers' brain scans while they pondered ethical dilemmas have found that the basis for making tough moral judgments is
题目分析:
本题比较长,语法结构略显复杂:
Researchers studying the brain scans of volunteers who pondered ethical dilemmas have found that the basis for making tough moral judgments is emotion, not logic or analytical reasoning.
两个划线的部分是各自先行词的定语,不是主干。
选项分析:
A选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
B选项:and是连词,必须连接两个句子。但是在本选项中,and身前的小句缺少谓语动词。(本选项中的to make应该改为for making,考查了“不定式和ing的区别”。很容易判断。)
另外,在found这句话中,本选项可以看作:
Researchers found the basis to be emotion.
其应该改为:
Researchers found that the basis is emotion.
这点考查了“不定式和从句的区别”。用之于本题,显然谓语动词find的控制力很弱,应该用宾语从句。
C选项:and身前没有谓语动词错误同(B)。
D选项:Researchers found the basis to be emotion应改为Researchers found that the basis is emotion错误同选项(B)。本选项中的 while pondering ethical dilemmas是伴随状语,这分词短语前添加连词形式的伴随状语非常常见,万不能判断为错。
E选项:代词they的指代对象在语法上只能是researchers,因为volunteers’已经是所有格了,变为了形容词,不能被代词指代。但是they在逻辑上应该指的是志愿者。
D选项与E类似,都是把ponder的主语变researchers,逻辑不通,应该是volunteers pondered才合逻辑。我就错选了E啊,想的是应该在志愿者ponder的同时进行scan,结果就掉进坑里了。。。
错了。。。。
从表达方面看,这一句本身感觉不是最佳,主语的限定修饰过长,主谓之间插入过多内容。可能将studying作前置定语会更清晰。
我是直接认为while作为连词,接完整的句子,D直接杀
不一定,省略主语就变成了while加v-ing。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
以为E选项they赘余,其实不是,还原回去都有they
对啦,但想法有误,没看出来found那块儿的动词和不定式区别,且E选项代词they的指代对象在语法上只能是researchers,因为volunteers’已经是所有格了,变为了形容词,不能被代词指代