扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / OG2016-SC-90
Prices at the producer level are only 1.3 percent higher now than a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the South are hurting crops and therefore raised corn and soybean prices.
than a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the South are hurting crops and therefore raised
than those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the South are hurting crops and therefore raising
than a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the South, and are hurting crops and therefore raising
as those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the South hurt crops and therefore raise
as they were a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the South, and are hurting crops and therefore raising
题目分析：
略。
选项分析：
A选项：比较对象不对等。本题想比较的不是两个年份，而是两个年份的价格。检查本选项最合理的比较对象可知，我们真正应该比较的是“现在的价格”和“一年前的价格”。如果只用now，相当于比较的是“一年前的情况”和“现在的情况”，这是不对的。因为“价格的情况”和“价格”是不同的，只有价格才能higher（高低），价格的其它情况或者属性是没有高低之分的。
B选项：Correct. 本选项在逻辑和语法上均是正确的。
C选项：比较对象错误同(A)。
D选项：higher+than是习惯表达，不能加as。
E选项：本选项错误同(D)。
hurting和raised可以并列吗
本题中不行。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
课上不是举了个例子说people in china are taller than poeple in Japan 等同于 than in japan 吗？所以A选项也可以吧？而且为啥用进行时啊？价格提高不是已经发生了么？
这里用be going down的意思是“还在持续下滑”。正在进行时表示还在发生的事情嘛~
（V）People in China are taller than people in Japan.
（V）People in China are taller than in Japan.
（X）People in China are taller than Japan.(语法没错，逻辑错了，国家不能比高矮)
a year ago就是时间状语呀，和now对应，逻辑没错吧？
本来做对了，看了以上对话，又迷糊了，说得对啊，now和课堂上的例子in japan对应，都是状语，前面相当于都省略了，为啥in Japan行，now不行？
我建议用语义去理解，这道题是今年的价格高于去年的价格，上面举的taller的例子，用语义理解，People in China are taller than in Japan.可以理解为，住在中国的人的身高高于在日本的。而不能理解为住在中国的人的身高高于日本，你会发现汉语也不通顺。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
对啦