As sources of electrical power, windmills now account for only about 2,500 megawatts nationwide, but production is almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households.
almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide
almost expected that it will double by the end of the year, thus providing
expected that it will almost double by the end of the year to provide
expected almost to double by the end of the year and thus to provide
expected almost to double by the end of the year, which would thus be providing
题目分析:
略
选项分析:
A选项:which would provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households是定语从句,在语法上就近修饰名词the year。但是,在逻辑上,能提供电力的应该是production。
B选项:因为production is expected是被动语态,所以逻辑上production是expect的宾语。根据本选项的内容,expect身后还有一个宾语从句,即,that it will double by the end of the year。这会使得expect相当于带了两个宾语。这是不合乎逻辑的,只有表达“传递”类的动词,才可以带两个宾语(诸如give pass等等)。
C选项:本选项错误同(B)。
D选项:Correct. 本选项在逻辑和语法上均是正确的。
E选项:本选项错误同(A)。
正确:
it is expected that ;
sb/sth is expected to do
sb expext that (曼哈顿里的idiom)
错误:
sb/sth is expected that
The usage of that after expected requires a subject and production cannot be the subject for it..
production is expected that it will almost double by the end of the year.. THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE
so two ways to speak is..
production is expected to double..
OR it is expected that the production will double
求求老师不要再胡说八道了。
你写的这个他之前也讲过,可能这里懒得延展了吧,“胡说八道”就有点过分了吧
谢谢大佬撑腰,确实是怪我懒了,现在把选项B的解析更新的更详细了些~
毕老师写过 “不定式和从句” 的区别~我就是通过这个排除的B 层主可以康康~
这道题通过不定式和从句的区别来区分
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
It is expected that , or sb/sth is expected to do
In this case, we can say,
production is expected to double by the end of the year, and thus to provide or
it is expected that the production will double by the end of the year and thus provide...
所以year,which 那里 默认是就近修饰嘛
我也觉得奇怪,我以为是逗号之后的定语从句用来修饰前面的句子
which不能修饰句子,这个和口语和非正式用法里我们常用的不一样,可以听听Ron的网课
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
正确:
it is expected that ;
sb/sth is expected to do
sb expext that (曼哈顿里的idiom)
错误:
sb/sth is expected that
只有表达“传递”类的动词,才可以带两个宾语(诸如give pass等等
正确:
it is expected that ;
sb/sth is expected to do
sb expext that (曼哈顿里的idiom)
错误:
sb/sth is expected that
expected的宾语是production,这里倒装了
it is expected that ;
sb/sth is expected to do
GMAT Idoms
which什么时候可以跳跃修饰呢?为什么这里A不可以啊
A. production is expected do double没问题,sth. is expected to...; which引导的非限定性定语从句改变了语意,且修饰的是year
b. sth. is expected that有问题,正确的可以是it is expected that/sth. is expected to../sb. expect that
C. 同B
D.正确,and前后的平行关系很正确
E. 同A
it is expected that
sb/sth is expected to do
sb expext that
BC选项:因为production is expected是被动语态,所以逻辑上production是expect的宾语。根据本选项的内容,expect身后还有一个宾语从句,即,that it will double by the end of the year。这会使得expect相当于带了两个宾语。这是不合乎逻辑的,只有表达“传递”类的动词,才可以带两个宾语(诸如give pass等等)。
正确的用法:
production is expected to double.
it is expected that the production will double.
而不能说:
production is expected that it will doulbe.
1.expected后面一定是To do,不可以接从句
2. Which的指代问题
it is expected that ...... 正确
sb/sth is expected to do 正确
sb expect that...... 错误
sb/sth is expected that...... 错误,sb/sth和that从句都变成了expect的宾语
B选项:因为production is expected是被动语态,所以逻辑上production是expect的宾语。根据本选项的内容,expect身后还有一个宾语从句,即,that it will double by the end of the year。这会使得expect相当于带了两个宾语。这是不合乎逻辑的,只有表达“传递”类的动词,才可以带两个宾语(诸如give pass等等)。
almost这种修饰词,类似于only,一定要正好放在要修饰的词语前面,反过来说也就是放在哪个词的前面就是修饰哪个词
almost在这儿修饰double,所以不能在expect前面
B选项:因为production is expected是被动语态,所以逻辑上production是expect的宾语。根据本选项的内容,expect身后还有一个宾语从句,即,that it will double by the end of the year。这会使得expect相当于带了两个宾语。这是不合乎逻辑的,只有表达“传递”类的动词,才可以带两个宾语(诸如give pass等等)。
C选项:本选项错误同(B)。
D选项:Correct. 本选项在逻辑和语法上均是正确的。
摘:it is expected that sth will do 是对的,参见曼哈顿语法,但是sb is expected that it will就不对了,需用sb is expected to do
感觉和likely类似,it is likely that sth will do 是对的,同参见曼哈顿语法,但是sb is likely that it will就不对,需用sb is likely to do
expect身后不能用宾语从句,而应该用不定式
expect sb to do sth; expect sth,期待某人作某事,期待某物。如:如:We are expecting a rise in food prices this month. 期待是影响力大的动词,表期待时不说expect that。
表预料时可以说expect that,如: I expect that it will rain.我预料到会下雨。