扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / OG2017-SC-799
As criminal activity on the Internet becomes more and more sophisticated, not only are thieves able to divert cash from company bank accounts, they can also pilfer valuable information such as business development strategies, new product specifications, and contract bidding plans, and sell the data to competitors.
they can also pilfer valuable information such as business development strategies, new product specifications, and contract bidding plans, and sell
they can also pilfer valuable information that includes business development strategies, new product specifications, and contract bidding plans, and selling
also pilfering valuable information including business development strategies, new product specifications, and contract bidding plans, selling
but also pilfer valuable information such as business development strategies, new product specifications, and contract bidding plans to sell
but also pilfering valuable information such as business development strategies, new product specifications, and contract bidding plans and selling
题目分析：
本题比较难。很多考生一看到未划线部分有一个not only，然后立刻就在选项中找but also。实际上，not only…but also…确实是一个习惯表达，但是并不是唯一正确的习惯表达。可以用not only…but…，也可以用not only…also…。
选项分析：
A选项：Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
B选项：and身后的selling the data to competitors是一个分词短语，该分词短语在and身前并没有平行对象。
C选项：pilfering valuable information是分词短语。句型not only…but also…中，not only和but also必须各自引导一个完整的句子，需要有完整的主谓结构。（当然，not only…but also…和and做连词是一个道理，也可以因为省略现象而只连接两个功能相同的部分。本题中的not only身后就是一个完整句，所以but also身后也必须是完整句）
D选项：句型not only…but also…中，not only和but also必须各自引导一个完整的句子，本选项的but also身后缺少主语。
E选项：pilfering valuable information是分词短语错误同(C)。
老师你好， 我有点想不通 A 选项 难道不是run-on么？
As criminal a .... sophisticated，这部分是as 引导的subordinate clause,
not only are thieves able to divert cash ..... , not only 是副词，不是连词，后面跟的是一个完整的主谓语结构，所以这句话是independent clause.
they can also pilfer ....., and sell the data... , 这里又是一个有完整主谓结构的句子，之前没有conjunction 连接。(also 在这里即使可以做连词，但是放在了整个分句主语they的后面，没有起到连接两个分句的作用）
所以A 整个句子的结构是 subordinate clause, independent clause(S+V), independent clause (S + V) 这是明显的run-on啊。要怎么make sense of it 呢？求指导，谢谢！
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论