The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960's and 1970's sought to go beyond the traditional focus of political historians on leaders and government institutions by examining directly the political practices of ordinary citizens. Like the old approach, however, this new approach excluded women. The very techniques these historians used to uncover mass political behavior in the nineteenth century United States - quantitative analyses of election returns, for example--were useless in analyzing the political activities of women, who were denied the vote until 1920.
By redefining "political activity", historian Paula Baker has developed a political history that includes women. She concludes that among ordinary citizens, political activism by women in the nineteenth century prefigured trends in twentieth century politics. Defining "politics" as "any action taken to affect the course of behavior of government or of the community", Baker concludes that, while voting and holding office were restricted to men, women in the nineteenth century organized themselves into societies committed to social issues such as temperance and poverty. In other words, Baker contends, women activists were early practitioners of nonpartisan, issue oriented politics and thus were more interested in enlisting lawmakers, regardless of their party affiliation, on behalf of certain issues than in ensuring that one party another won an election. In the twentieth century, more men drew closer to women's ideas about politics and took up modes of issue oriented politics that Baker sees women as having pioneered.
The passage suggests which of the following concerning the techniques used by the new political historians described in the first paragraph of the passage?
They involved the extensive use of the biographies of political party leaders and political theoreticians.
They were conceived by political historians who were reacting against the political climates of the 1960s and 1970s.
They were of more use in analyzing the positions of United States political parties in the nineteenth century than in analyzing the positions of those in the twentieth century.
They were of more use in analyzing the political behavior of nineteenthcentury voters than in analyzing the political activities of those who could not vote during that period.
They were devised as a means of tracing the influence of nineteenth-century political trends on twentieth-century political trends.
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 D。
因为文中提到,新派政治史当时想要超越传统方法,也就是政治历史学家关注领导人和政府机构,而是直接考察普通公民的政治行为。但是新派政治史却忽略了妇女,这种方法-也就是通过量化分析美国 19 世纪的投票返回来研究大众政治行为- 对于在 1920 年之前被剥夺投票权的妇女而言,并不那么有用。选项 D 跟上面的文中意思相符,即这种方法更有利于用来分析 19世纪选民的政治行为,而不是用来分析那些在当时被剥夺投票权的政治行为。
Like the old approach, however, this new approach excluded women. The very techniques these historians used to uncover mass political behavior in the nineteenth century United States - quantitative analyses of election returns, 细节对应的这里,mass political behavior,election returns,所以选d
定位在The very techniques these historians used to uncover mass political behavior in the nineteenth century United States - quantitative analyses of election returns, for example--were useless in analyzing the political activities of women, who were denied the vote until 1920.