Historians remain divided over the role of banks in facilitating economic growth in the United States in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Some scholars contend that banks played a minor role in the nation's growing economy. Financial institutions, they argue, appeared only after the economy had begun to develop, and once organized, followed conservative lending practices, providing aid to established commercial enterprises but shunning those, such as manufacturing and transportation projects, that were more uncertain and capital-intensive (i.e., requiring greater expenditures in the form of capital than in labor).
A growing number of historians argue, in contrast, that banks were crucial in transforming the early national economy. When state legislatures began granting more bank charters in the 1790s and early 1800s, the supply of credit rose accordingly. Unlike the earliest banks, which had primarily provided short-term loans to well-connected merchants, the banks of the early nineteenth century issued credit widely. As Paul Gilje asserts, the expansion and democratization of credit in the early nineteenth century became the driving force of the American economy, as banks began furnishing large amounts of capital to transportation and industrial enterprises. The exception, such historians argue, was in the South; here, the overwhelmingly agrarian nature of the economy generated outright opposition to banks, which were seen as monopolistic institutions controlled by an elite group of planters.
The passage suggests that the opposition to banks in the South in the early nineteenth century stemmed in part from the perception that banks
did not benefit more than a small minority of the people
did not support the interests of elite planters
were too closely tied to transportation and industrial interests
were unwilling to issue the long-term loans required by agrarian interests
were too willing to lend credit widely
题目分析:
文章细节题:文章认为对19世纪早期的南方银行的反对有一部分是因为这些银行:
原文对这类银行的介绍是:是由精英种植园主建立的垄断机构。
选项分析:
A选项:没有让一小部分人之外的人受益:正确。这类银行被视为种植园主的垄断机构,说明除了他们,其他人无法从中受益。
B选项:没有支持精英种植园主的利益:和文章描述相反,这类银行就是服务于种植园主的。
C选项:和交通业和工业的利益过于紧密:原文没有提这类银行和这两个行业的关系。
D选项:不愿意给农业经济提供长期贷款:原文没提。
E选项:非常愿意广泛提供贷款:这并不属于这类银行的特点。
句子理解错误banks, which were seen as monopolistic institutions controlled by an elite group of planters.which后的定语从句修饰银行
A选项:没有让一小部分人之外的人受益:正确。这类银行被视为种植园主的垄断机构,说明除了他们,其他人无法从中受益。
rc
选错b
定位“The exception, such historians argue, was in the South; here, the overwhelmingly agrarian nature of the economy generated outright opposition to banks, which were seen as monopolistic institutions controlled by an elite group of planters.”
这里的which值得是banks,(不要以为阅读中没有就近修饰原则),bank被精英种植园主控制,||重点是读懂长难句||
monopolistic垄断的
句意理解错误 应该是反对南方银行的原因是什么,而不是南方银行的对面的特征,属于低级错误,可能最后一篇看的太浮躁了
which指代的是银行,银行被反对,银行被认为被小部分精英农场主所控制。
the overwhelmingly agrarian nature of the economy generated outright opposition to banks, which were seen as monopolistic institutions controlled by an elite group of planters.
银行被看作是是由种植主所控制的垄断集团
定位最后一句,同义转换。gmat套路就是不能infer过多,但又不能太明显,只能同义转换增加难度。
controlled by an elite group of planters.与a small minority of the people是对应关系
banks, which were seen as monopolistic institutions controlled by an elite group of planters.
A选项:elite group 的垄断机构,可以推出银行仅仅有利于少数人;
B选项:说反了
C选项:they believed that the banks were tied too closely to planters, not transportation and industrial interests.
D选项:没提到
E选项:没提到
which were seen as monopolistic institutions controlled by an elite group of planters.
错选E,定位错误;
banks in the South, 定位到最后一句话“The exception“ ,定位准确的话,肯定就是A,没有疑问‘