Historians remain divided over the role of banks in facilitating economic growth in the United States in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Some scholars contend that banks played a minor role in the nation's growing economy. Financial institutions, they argue, appeared only after the economy had begun to develop, and once organized, followed conservative lending practices, providing aid to established commercial enterprises but shunning those, such as manufacturing and transportation projects, that were more uncertain and capital-intensive (i.e., requiring greater expenditures in the form of capital than in labor).

A growing number of historians argue, in contrast, that banks were crucial in transforming the early national economy. When state legislatures began granting more bank charters in the 1790s and early 1800s, the supply of credit rose accordingly. Unlike the earliest banks, which had primarily provided short-term loans to well-connected merchants, the banks of the early nineteenth century issued credit widely. As Paul Gilje asserts, the expansion and democratization of credit in the early nineteenth century became the driving force of the American economy, as banks began furnishing large amounts of capital to transportation and industrial enterprises. The exception, such historians argue, was in the South; here, the overwhelmingly agrarian nature of the economy generated outright opposition to banks, which were seen as monopolistic institutions controlled by an elite group of planters.


Which of the following statements best describes the function of the last sentence of the passage?


It provides evidence tending to undermine the viewpoint of the scholars mentioned in the highlighted text.


It resolves a conflict over the role of banks summarized in the first paragraph.

It clarifies some of the reasons state legislatures began granting more bank charters.

It qualifies a claim made earlier in the passage about the impact of banks on the American economy in the early nineteenth century.

It supports a claim made earlier in the passage about how the expansion of credit affected the economy.

考题讲解

题目分析:

文章推断题:文章最后一句话的作用是?

文章最后一句话讲了一个例外——南方的情况,并没有像其他地区一样,促进经济发展,说明第二段的观点有不适用的地方

选项分析:

A选项:为了削弱高亮的学者的观点:与第一段无关。

B选项:解决了两种观点的冲突之处:文章并没有解决此冲突

C选项:阐述了立法者开始发放银行执照的原因:无关

D选项:
它对第二段的结论进行了限定,正确。

E选项:
支持之前关于“信贷的扩张如何影响经济”的观点:南方的情况只是作为一种补充说明,使此论点更精确

展开显示

登录注册 后可以参加讨论

OG2017-RC