Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
A photograph of the night sky was taken with the camera shutter open for an extended period. The normal motion of stars across the sky caused the images of the stars in the photograph to appear as streaks. However, one bright spot was not streaked. Even if the spot were caused, as astronomers believe, by a celestial object, that object could still have been moving across the sky during the time the shutter was open, since ____________.
the spot was not the brightest object in the photograph
the photograph contains many streaks that astronomers can identify as caused by noncelestial objects
stars in the night sky do not appear to shift position relative to each other
the spot could have been caused by an object that emitted a flash that lasted for only a fraction of the time that the camera shutter was open
if the camera shutter had not been open for an extended period, it would have recorded substantially fewer celestial objects
星星移动----照片条纹
照相的时候一个天体在移动-----也有条纹 削弱类比推理 给出这个天体和其他普通星星的区别
A 是不是最亮无关
B 没提到区别
C 没区别
D 因为在拍摄的时候它发光,所以导致没条纹,给出了区别
E 没提到区别
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论