Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
A photograph of the night sky was taken with the camera shutter open for an extended period. The normal motion of stars across the sky caused the images of the stars in the photograph to appear as streaks. However, one bright spot was not streaked. Even if the spot were caused, as astronomers believe, by a celestial object, that object could still have been moving across the sky during the time the shutter was open, since ____________.
the spot was not the brightest object in the photograph
the photograph contains many streaks that astronomers can identify as caused by noncelestial objects
stars in the night sky do not appear to shift position relative to each other
the spot could have been caused by an object that emitted a flash that lasted for only a fraction of the time that the camera shutter was open
if the camera shutter had not been open for an extended period, it would have recorded substantially fewer celestial objects
来帮大家翻译一下题: 行星因为在运动,所以在延时摄影中会留下streak。有一张照片里面有一个亮点而不是streak,但也有可能是星星,因为——————————。这是高中数学常见的充分必要性问题,A(行星运动)充分,B (造成streak)必要。非B不能推出非A。正确选项解释了为啥非B的情况下A也是有可能成立的。天文学家的解释是亮点可能是天体造成的,因为这个天体可以是在运动的过程中闪光了一下,在照片上留下了一个点而不是线。懂了嘛?懂了给我点个赞
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论