Economist: Paying extra for fair-trade coffee——coffee labeled with the Fairtrade logo——is intended to help poor farmers, because they receive a higher price for the fair-trade coffee they grow. But this practice may hurt more farmers in developing nations than it helps. By raiding average prices for coffee, it encourages more coffee to be produced than consumers want to buy. This lower prices for no-fair-trade coffee and thus lowers profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers.
To evaluate the strength of the economist’s argument, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?
Whether there is a way of alleviating the impact of the increased average prices for coffee on non-fair-trade coffee farmer’s profits
What proportion of coffee farmers in developing nations produce fair-trade coffee
Whether many coffee farmers in developing nations also derive income from other kinds of farming
Whether consumers should pay extra for fair-trade coffee if doing so lowers profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers
How fair-trade coffee farmers in developing nations could be helped without lowering profits for non-fair-trade coffee farmers
因果推理
因为fair trade的农民会疯狂产咖啡,导致咖啡价格下跌
所以non fair trade农民遭殃 评价是否真的会影响non农民利润
B Fair trade农民比例是。。取极端,99%是fair trade 那么non trade根本没影响,99% non 那影响太大了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论