Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
Utrania was formerly a major petroleum exporter, but in recent decades economic stagnation and restrictive regulations inhibited investment in new oil fields. In consequence, Utranian oil exports dropped steadily as old fields became depleted. Utrania's currently improving economic situation, together with less-restrictive regulations, will undoubtedly result in the rapid development of new fields. However, it would be premature to conclude that the rapid development of new fields will result in higher oil exports, because __________.
the price of oil is expected to remain relatively stable over the next several years
the improvement in the economic situation in Utrania is expected to result in a dramatic increase in the proportion of Utranians who own automobiles
most of the investment in new oil fields in Utrania is expected to come from foreign sources
new technology is available to recover oil from old oil fields formerly regarded as depleted
many of the new oil fields in Utrania are likely to be as productive as those that were developed during the period when Utrania was a major oil exporter
premature 过早的
所以选项是要选可以削弱 the rapid development of new fields will result in higher oil exports
题目里讲的是出口 如果内需大了出口就会减少
CDE直接排掉了,A是说油价不变,B是说内需增大。油价不变,价格和本题无关。
新的开采----出口增多
现在新开采----出口增多。 削弱出口增多
A 油价稳定 这里不考虑价格
B 导致买车的人增多,国内用油量增多,不一定出口增多
C 投资来源 无关
D 没谈到新开采
E 产量怎么样。。和出口没关系
归因:分析方法错误
不要再用归纳推理去归纳原因了,总会出现想不到的原因
前提至少是结论的必要条件,取非判断即可
A价格波动与否和出口量变化相关性太弱
premature 过早的
所以选项是要选可以削弱 the rapid development of new fields will result in higher oil exports,而显然B选项是一个完美的他因削弱,即提到了这种情况,即rapid development of new field是由于国内拥有车比例增加而增加的。所以这个原因削弱了原文:“result in higher oil exports"
相关因果
U的经济形势很好,新领域蓬勃发展→并不意味着更高的石油出口
(解释)因为
A、未来油价相对稳定,无关出口
B、U的经济形势好会导致极大提高U人买汽车的比率(石油都内部消化了),CORRECT
C、新领域的投资大多来源于外国,无关出口
D、新技术让油田里正在消减的石油recover,无关出口
E、新油田生产石油很大可能和U当年作为主要石油出口国的时候一样好,无关,甚至反向
B;出口 —— 共给和内需
C:投资来源和出口无关
这道题我是完全理解错了,我把many of the new oil fields想成U的竞争对手了 我滴妈耶。。。。。。
这道题考虑的是需求与供给的问题
E选项在说供给问题,与出口无关
C选项在说需求问题(内需增加,出口自然就少了呀)
出口是否能增加依赖于需求!!!!!
permanent adj.永恒的
permeate V.弥漫,渗透
premature adj.未成熟的;早产的;仓促的,草率的
第一遍看选不出来答案。。。仔细看一下发现B的意思是内需增大,这样才对嘛
premature
premature
premature
premature
premature 过早! so early
自己翻译有问题 所以选错了
因为价格的不变也有可能使得出口更加大量,
而出口转内需则有可能大幅减少出口
考虑影响export的因素——需求or供给
premature 过早下结论了(否定结论)
记得有过类似的,那道题甚至定语都给了,好像是vehicle guzzling oil之类的
我感觉理解为因果推理好一点:因为文中给出的推理链是
因: rapid development of new fields
果:result in higher oil exports。
那么这中间的gap就是新开的field所带来的油的产量增加能否先达到满足内需的量,只有满足了内需才能再进行出口。而B讲的就是一个内需扩大的征兆,所以它可以打断文中的因果链
理解错了。。。居然把C里面的外来投资想成了投资国外的油田(然后出口给别的国家)。。。做题的时候在想啥呢=,=
石油出口大国Utrania的石油开采被政府限制,其最近的经济发展源于政府对新产业的政策宽松,且文中问Utrania的经济繁荣不会导致石油出口上升的理由。新油田开发受限,产量无法上升,不会导致出口上升,但要解释Utrania的经济繁荣从石油出口转到什么方向,B从石油需求由出口转为内需解释了这个问题。