Structural unemployment—the unemployment that remains even at the peak of the economy’s upswings—is caused by an imbalance between the types and locations of available employment on the one hand and the qualifications and locations of workers on the other hand. When such an imbalance exists, both labor shortages and unemployment may occur, despite a balance between supply and demand for labor in the economy as a whole.
Because technological change is likely to displace some workers, it is a major factor in producing structural unemployment. While technological advance almost invariably results in shifts in demands for different types of workers, it does not necessarily result in unemployment. Relatively small or gradual changes in demand are likely to cause little unemployment. In the individual firm or even in the labor market as a whole, normal attrition may be sufficient to reduce the size of the work force in the affected occupations. Relatively large or rapid changes, however, can cause serious problems. Workers may lose their jobs and find themselves without the skills necessary to obtain new jobs. Whether this displacement leads to structural unemployment depends on the amount of public and private sector resources devoted to retraining and placing those workers. Workers can be encouraged to move where there are jobs, to reeducate or retrain themselves, or to retire. In addition, other factors affecting structural unemployment, such as capital movement, can be controlled.
Increased structural unemployment, should it occur, makes it difficult for the economy to achieve desired low rates of unemployment along with low rates of inflation. If there is a growing pool of workers who lack the necessary skills for the available jobs, increases in total labor demand will rapidly generate shortages of qualified workers. As the wages of those workers are bid up, labor costs, and thus prices, rise. This phenomenon may be an important factor in the rising trend, observed for the past two decades, of unemployment combined with inflation. Government policy has placed a priority on reducing inflation, but these efforts have nevertheless caused unemployment to increase.
According to the passage, small downward shifts in the demand for labor will not usually cause unemployment because
such shifts are frequently accompanied by upswings in the economy
such shifts usually occur slowly
workers can be encouraged to move to where there are jobs
normal attrition is often sufficient to reduce the size of the work force
workers are usually flexible enough to learn new skills and switch to new jobs
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 D。因为文章提到,相对较小或者慢速的变化不太可能导致失业,而这种变化通常可以通过正常的离职来减少劳动力量的大小。所以选项 D 正确。
normal attrition....这题多友好啊,都没用同义改写而是直接上原词(可我还是选错了)
看定位句要看完全~
Relatively small or gradual changes in demand are likely to cause little unemployment. 很有可能不会造成失业。little的意思要理解,发现这句话和问题will not cause一样。然后答案在下一句normal attrition may be sufficient to reduce the size of the work force in the affected occupations.
normal attrition is often sufficient to reduce the size of the work force 这个选项和原文一模一样,心想不会这么简单怎么办。。。
看完其它几个选项都不符合 那么就帮你确认正确答案了
normal attrition is often sufficient to reduce the size of the work force. 这句话怎么理解呢?
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论