A key decision required of advertising managers is whether a "hard-sell" or "soft-sell" strategy Line is appropriate for a specific target market. The hard-sell approach involves the use of direct, forceful claims regarding the benefits of the advertised brand over competitors' offerings. In contrast, the soft-sell approach involves the use of advertising claims that imply superiority more subtly.
One positive aspect of the hard-sell approach is its use of very simple and straightforward product claims presented claims presented as explicit conclusions, with little room for confusion regarding the advertiser's message. However, some consumers may resent being told what to believe and some may distrust the message. Resentment and distrust often lead to counterargumentation and to boomerang effects where consumers come to believe conclusions diametrically opposed to conclusions endorsed in advertising claims, By contrast, the risk of boomerang erects is greatly reduced with soft-sell approaches. One way to implement the soft-sell approach is to provide information that implies the main conclusions the advertiser wants the consumer to draw, but leave the conclusions themselves unstated. Because consumers are invited to make up their own minds, implicit conclusions reduce the risk of resentment, distrust, and counter argumentation.
Recent research on consumer memory and judgment suggests another advantage of implicit conclusions. Beliefs or conclusions that are self-generated are more accessible from memory than beliefs from conclusions provided explicitly by other individuals, and thus have a greater impact on judgment and decision making. Moreover, self-generated beliefs are often perceived as more accurate and valid than the beliefs of others, because other individuals may be perceived as less knowledgeable, or may be perceived as manipulative or deliberately misleading.
Despite these advantages, implicit conclusions may not always be more effective than explicit Conclusions. One risk is that some consumers may fail to draw their own conclusions and thus miss the point of the message. .Inferential activity is likely only when consumers are motivated and able to engage in effortful cognitive processes. Another risk is that some con-Summers may draw conclusions Other than the one intended ,Even if inferential activity is likely there is no guarantee that consumers will follow the path provided by the advertiser. Finally, a third risk is that consumers may infer the intended conclusion but question the validity of their inference.
it can be inferred from the passage that advertisers could reduce one of the risks discussed in the last paragraph if they were able to provide
motivation for consumers to think about the advertisement's message
information that implies the advertiser's intended conclusion but leaves that conclusion unstated
subtle evidence that the advertised product is superior to that of competitors
information comparing the advertised product with its competitors
opportunity for consumers to generate their own beliefs or conclusions
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 B,详细解释如下:
从文章最后一段可以得出,广告商可以通过提供信息,暗示他们希望消费者得出的结论,但不直接陈述结论,来降低其中某些风险。因此,选项B与文章内容一致,是正确答案。
Inferential activity is likely only when consumers are motivated and able to engage in effortful cognitive processes.
想要他们去推 得motivate他们
最后一段根本没有competitors
One risk is that some consumers may fail to draw their own conclusions and thus miss the point of the message. .Inferential activity is likely only when consumers are motivated and able to engage in effortful cognitive processes. 所以是 提供 motivation就可以reduce the risk
. .Inferential activity is likely only when consumers are motivated and able to engage in effortful cognitive processes.
原文最后一段有三个risk,r1是消费者是否会错过point,r2是消费者是否会理解错point,r3是消费者无从确定自己理解对了point。C D首要排除,未提及competitors, E选项引导消费者产生自己的belief,实际上这就是soft-sell的内容, B选项提供消费者含蓄而不直白的信息, 这也是soft-sell的内容。而A选项给消费者动力去思考message,指的就是r1,以防消费者错过point。
感觉A选项对三种风险也都可以减轻啊