A key decision required of advertising managers is whether a "hard-sell" or "soft-sell" strategy Line is appropriate for a specific target market. The hard-sell approach involves the use of direct, forceful claims regarding the benefits of the advertised brand over competitors' offerings. In contrast, the soft-sell approach involves the use of advertising claims that imply superiority more subtly.
One positive aspect of the hard-sell approach is its use of very simple and straightforward product claims presented claims presented as explicit conclusions, with little room for confusion regarding the advertiser's message. However, some consumers may resent being told what to believe and some may distrust the message. Resentment and distrust often lead to counterargumentation and to boomerang effects where consumers come to believe conclusions diametrically opposed to conclusions endorsed in advertising claims, By contrast, the risk of boomerang erects is greatly reduced with soft-sell approaches. One way to implement the soft-sell approach is to provide information that implies the main conclusions the advertiser wants the consumer to draw, but leave the conclusions themselves unstated. Because consumers are invited to make up their own minds, implicit conclusions reduce the risk of resentment, distrust, and counter argumentation.
Recent research on consumer memory and judgment suggests another advantage of implicit conclusions. Beliefs or conclusions that are self-generated are more accessible from memory than beliefs from conclusions provided explicitly by other individuals, and thus have a greater impact on judgment and decision making. Moreover, self-generated beliefs are often perceived as more accurate and valid than the beliefs of others, because other individuals may be perceived as less knowledgeable, or may be perceived as manipulative or deliberately misleading.
Despite these advantages, implicit conclusions may not always be more effective than explicit Conclusions. One risk is that some consumers may fail to draw their own conclusions and thus miss the point of the message. .Inferential activity is likely only when consumers are motivated and able to engage in effortful cognitive processes. Another risk is that some con-Summers may draw conclusions Other than the one intended ,Even if inferential activity is likely there is no guarantee that consumers will follow the path provided by the advertiser. Finally, a third risk is that consumers may infer the intended conclusion but question the validity of their inference.
It can be inferred from the passage that one situation in which the boomerang effect often occurs is when consumers
have been exposed to forceful claims that are diametrically opposed to those in an advertiser's message
have previous self-generated beliefs or conclusions that are readily accessible from memory
are subjected to advertising messages that are targeted at specific markets to which those consumers do not belong
are confused regarding the point of the advertiser's message
come to view the advertiser's message with suspicion
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 E。因为文章中提到,当消费者怀疑广告者的信息时,常常会导致回旋效应,这会导致消费者相反于广告宣传的结论。由此可以推断,要避免回旋效应,消费者应该避免怀疑广告者的信息。
Resentment and distrust often lead to counterargumentation
没理解题目,应该是in what situation, customer will have boomerange effect
这道题有点狡猾我也做错了。A不对是因为expose和believe还是有区别;Expose不一定会相信啊~
. 是boomerang effect的结果,而Resentment and distrust 才是boomerang effect出现的原因。仔细分析原文,原文的意思是:厌恶和怀疑经常会导致异议和适得其反的结果,使人们开始相信与广告里完全相反的结论
it's harder question, though.
Resentment and distrust often lead to counterargumentation and to boomerang effects where consumers come to believe conclusions diametrically opposed to conclusions endorsed in adverrising claims,
A trap 並不是有人打擊廣告商,而是對廣告商本身討厭。
A不对是因为广告商的信息与消费者believe的信息不同才会产生反向效应, 而不是与expose to消费者的信息不同