Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.
prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of
prevented from having its acoustic energy dissipated by
its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by
its acoustic energy prevented from being dissipated as a result of
preventing its acoustic energy from dissipating by
as a result of 后面的核心词会发生改变 是整件事导致的 而不是boundaries这个东西导致的 有as a result of 的统统去掉
ABE,伴随主语都是sound,不合逻辑,排除
CD,独立主格结构。D,being没有必要,排除
C correct
E没有被动语态需要用到by
AD as a result 不对
B sound is prevented from( having its acoustic energy dissipated) by boundaries
C its acoustic energy is prevented from dissipating by boundaries
对比BC,B的意思不对,boundaries 是帮助sound走更远的,而不是损害它的,并且by 既可以是接着prevented又可以是接着dissipated歧义
a选项,as a result of 作为状语可以修饰应直接修饰前面的动词dissipating,所以修饰对象错了,应用来修饰prevent。
a选项,消耗能量不是界限的结果,防止它消耗能量才是界限的结果。
b选项,可以是prevented by也可以是 dissipated by有歧义。
acoustic energy被boundry prevent,全程与sound无关,只是为了说明acoustic energy是sound的acoustic energy
B错在sound被prevent, 应该是energy 被prevent
the real issue with (b) is that it can be read as "...dissipated by boundaries".in other words, choice (b) seems to suggest that the boundaries themselves can dissipate the acoustic energy; this is the opposite of the intended meaning. actual meaning is that boundaries are helping in preventing the dissipation of energy..
as a result of 后面的核心词会发生改变 是整件事导致的 而不是boundaries这个东西导致的 有as a result of 的统统去掉
b water prevent 错误 这不是can 的平行并列啊。这完全是两个事情 不能连在一起说
e preventing的逻辑主语是sound这是不对的
A,B,C,E分别错在哪里呢?这句话应该怎么翻译才正确呢?
e的话就变成sound prevent acoustic energy from dissipating了,显然不合逻辑
AB都是sound is prevented,也不和逻辑
D being dissipated没必要,被动式用by表示动作发起者,而不是as a result of,且语义不符,as a result of表现的是因果关系
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
独立主格结构
AB prevented修饰distance 不符合逻辑
CD 独立主格 boundary prevent energy。。。正确 D being多余,被动by
E 逻辑主语错误
e因为主语变成sound了不符合逻辑
A, B, prevented from 前面有逗号,明显是个伴随状语, 那么它的逻辑主语就应该是Sound。 而Sound本身是不能发出prevent from dissipating阻止消散这个动作的,杀掉。同理杀掉E,逗号ing也是个伴随。
C和D:独立主格省略了连词with. D选项倒装还原后应该是as a result of boundaries in the ocean....., 缺逻辑主语 prevent energy from being dissipated. 另外这里being冗余,没有上下文的意思需要用到进行时。
C:正确。倒装还原为 Boundaries prevent energy from dissipating
1. 這題我一開始直接殺A,B, 因為句尾Ved分詞 抓到的邏輯主語是distances 距離阻擋 有點奇怪 刪AB 剩CDE
2. CD較相像 (1)看出被動 by>as a result of (2) being dissipated 冗贅 刪掉D 剩CE
3. 這題還是要了解獨立主格結構 不然會誤以為 its ~ energy為distances的同位語 誤刪
如果看得出來是獨立主格結構 只是糾結句意 看到by可以想說有兩種可能1.表被動 2.採行手段
看到_後面接N (boundaries) 它會是
(E) 手段嗎?句意:聲音(主語) 透過 海洋裡~~的邊界 來阻擋聲能消散 有點奇怪吧
(C) 如果是被動 句意:聲能是被海洋裡~~的邊界 所阻擋消散
C比較合理吧 所以選C
谁能详细讲解一下
我一来 就把CD排除了 以为没有连词............. 看下面评论知道是 独立主格 with 省略
the energy can dissipate-- it doesn't need sth else to dissipate it, so from being dissipated in d is weird
A选项:dissipate是不及物动词,后面不接宾语,所以错误;
B选项:having...dissipated by...很wordy;
CD选项:C/D选项是独立主格结构with + 名词 + done + 介词,此处省略with;D选项being多余;
E选项:Preventing的主语sound了,错误;
有没有谁 能详细讲解一下
有没有谁 能详细讲解一下
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
这个是个独立主格吧 当原因状语