Enforcement of local speed limits through police monitoring has proven unsuccessful in the town of Ardane. In many nearby towns, speed humps (raised areas of pavement placed across residential streets,about 300 feet apart) have reduced traffic speeds on residential streets by 20 to 25 percent. In order to reduce traffic speed and thereby enhance safety in residential neighborhoods, Ardane’s transportation commission plans to install multiple speed humps in those neighborhoods.
Which of the following, if true, identifies a potentially serious drawback to the plan for installing speed humps in Ardane?
On residential streets without speed humps,many vehicles travel at speeds more than 25 percent above the posted speed limit.
Because of their high weight, emergency vehicles such as fire trucks and ambulances must slow almost to a stop at speed humps.
The residential speed limit in Ardane is higher than that of the nearby towns where speed humps were installed.
Motorists who are not familiar with the streets in Ardane’s residential districts would be likely to encounter the speed humps unawares unless warned by signs and painted indicators.
Bicyclists generally prefer that speed humps be constructed so as to leave a space on the side of the road where bicycles can travel without going over the humps.
情景:A镇通过警察监督来限速的措施不太成功。在附近的镇子,安装在在居民区街道的减速带把速度减少了20-25%。为了减少速度并且提高居民社区的安全,A镇的交通部门计划在那些社区多安装几个减速带。
推理:此题为方案推理
目标:减速,保障安全。
方案:安装减速带。
选项分析:
A选项:没有减速带的居民街道,许多卡车超速25%:与方案无关。
B选项:正确。由于高重量,紧急车辆比如消防车和救护车必须在减速带前几乎停止:这里提到了方案带来的一个副作用,削弱了方案。
C选项:A镇的速度限制比附近安装了减速带的镇子的速度限制高:与方案无关。
D选项:除非被显著的标志警告,不熟悉A镇街道的司机有可能会在不知情的状态下遇到减速带:与方案无关。
E选项:骑自行车的人支持减速带,为了可以在道路边边留下可以让骑车人无减速带障碍地骑行:与方案无关。
回答了我的问题登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
我觉得B 选项虽然说是一个drawback,但是和政府的初衷(让大家follow speed limit)没有什么关系
请老师指教!
另外这里问的是方案的drawback,而不是strengthen or weaken
D选项,不熟悉路的人会无视,但至少一部分熟悉路的人会注意减速,所以方案至少in some way是有效的
问的是方案的副作用,选B。A与方案无关,不是方案带来的登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
方案:安装减速带。
2.推理:方案推理
3.可能方向:
CQ1、可行性 :安装减速带对减速没用
CQ2、可操作性 :现实条件很难安装减速带
CQ3副作用:安装了有什么负面效果
4.选项分析:B,属于CQ3,影响了急救。
而D不知情遇到减速带,那他是无视了减速带继续匀速开?还是急刹车?都不知道,不能再添加主观信息了。故原方案给出的信息无法推出减速带是否有无用,不考虑
C也不适用类比,类比的前提是A与B都有abc的相似然后推出d,这里的A与B都已经不相似了,别提d能够被类比出来。
附近的村:减速带限速成功
目标:减速和加强安全
方案:安装减速带
问题:方案的缺点
B: emergency vehicles- the side effect of the plan. The drawback is not a deal breaker, however, it does not have to be. The key is to attack the plan, but it doesn't necessarily mean to destroy it.
不能理解为类比推理,因为论述其他社区时没有提到减速带提高了安全性。登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
你这种推理明显加入太多主观要素了。GMAT是面向全世界的考试,要做到适用于全世界的考生,肯定不能按你这套这么搞登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
不知道這樣是否歸類正確? 感謝!
至於答案,我當初在B和C中糾結
因為誤以為此題為weaken 所以判斷B為out of scope
但如果此題為Inference (B)是帶有明顯"-"立場的
而(C)立場不明確
還有此題的目的是要reduce traffic speed 為相對值 但C講述的是現行限速的絕對值
所以就算是weaken題 削弱的程度也很弱
不知道大家覺得這樣推論合不合理 感謝!