Historians remain divided over the role of banks in facilitating economic growth in the United States in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Some scholars contend that banks played a minor role in the nation's growing economy. Financial institutions, they argue, appeared only after the economy had begun to develop, and once organized, followed conservative lending practices, providing aid to established commercial enterprises but shunning those, such as manufacturing and transportation projects, that were more uncertain and capital-intensive (i.e., requiring greater expenditures in the form of capital than in labor).

A growing number of historians argue, in contrast, that banks were crucial in transforming the early national economy. When state legislatures began granting more bank charters in the 1790s and early 1800s, the supply of credit rose accordingly. Unlike the earliest banks, which had primarily provided short-term loans to well-connected merchants, the banks of the early nineteenth century issued credit widely. As Paul Gilje asserts, the expansion and democratization of credit in the early nineteenth century became the driving force of the American economy, as banks began furnishing large amounts of capital to transportation and industrial enterprises. The exception, such historians argue, was in the South; here, the overwhelmingly agrarian nature of the economy generated outright opposition to banks, which were seen as monopolistic institutions controlled by an elite group of planters.


The primary purpose of the passage is to


compare the economic role played by southern banks with the economic role played by banks in the rest of the United States during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries

reevaluate a conventional interpretation of the role played by banks in the American economy during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries

present different interpretations of the role played by banks in the American economy during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries

analyze how the increasing number of banks in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries affected the American economy

examine how scholarly opinion regarding the role played by banks in the American economy during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries has changed over time

考题讲解

文章大意:

历史学家对银行在晚18早19世纪起到的作用一直有分歧:

1.     没啥作用:金融机构在经济起色后才出现,且保守得很

2.     挺重要的:银行越来越多 → 信贷更多 → 美国经济发展

3.     例外:南方


题目分析:文章主旨题

文章对比里两种银行有啥作用的观点,且两种观点有时间顺序。

选项分析:

A选项:比较“南方的银行和美国其他地方的银行的经济作用”:文章只在最后提了南方的情况特殊,不是文章主旨。

B选项:重新评估关于 “银行的作用” 的保守看法:文章没有重新评估传统看法,只是提出了不同于传统看法的新看法

C选项:提出两种不同的看法,正确。


D选项:
分析越来越多的银行对美国经济有什么影响:第二段提到了越来越多的银行促进了美国发展,但这只是第二个观点的论据,不是主旨。

E选项:
调查专家们的关于“银行的作用”的观点如何随着时间变化的:文章是在讲两派的观点(横向),而不是随着时间如何改的(纵向)

展开显示

登录注册 后可以参加讨论

OG2019-RC