Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, but it was found by a joint Canadian-Russian study to be both feasible as well as desirable if those routes are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year.
Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, but it was found by a joint Canadian-Russian study to be both feasible as well as desirable if those routes are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year.
Currently used by only two or three planes a day, a joint Canadian-Russian study has found that if air traffic routes over the North Pole are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year, it would be both feasible and desirable.
A joint Canadian-Russian study, finding it to be both feasible as well as desirable to open air traffic routes over the North Pole, which are currently used by only two or three planes a day, to thousands more commercial planes a year.
Although air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, a joint Canadian-Russian study has found that opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year is both feasible and desirable.
With air traffic routes over the North Pole currently used by only two or three planes a day, opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year has been found by a joint Canadian-Russian study as both feasible and desirable.
题目分析:
本题全划线,看似比较乱,但实则非常简单,只要将每个选项的成分找清,立刻可以找到答案。
选项分析:
A选项:首先,代词it的指代对象只能是单数名词,并列连词but身后的句子是被动语态,主动语序为:
a joint Canadian-Russian study found it to be both feasible as well as desirable.
在逻辑上,被发现是“可行的”且“令人满意的”应该是“每年开放这些航线给更多的飞机”这件事,而不是某个单数名词(代词只能指代名词,不能指代句子)。
其次,found不论是主动还是被动,宾语和宾语的补足语部分都不能用不定式短语,应该用从句或ing形式来表达,这点考查了不定式和从句的区别。由于find的约束力较弱,所以其宾语和宾语的补足语不能用不定式to be的形式。
再次,both…and…是固定搭配,不能用both…as well as…。
B选项:本选项句首的currently used by only two or three planes a day是一个过去分词短语,在句中必然是伴随状语,其逻辑主句和其所修饰的句子的主语相同,即,a joint Canadian-Russian study。但在逻辑上,“每天被2~3个飞机用”的应该是“航线”,而不是“研究”。
另外,代词it的指代对象有误同选项(A)。
C选项:本选项没有谓语动词;代词 it的指代对象有误同选项(A);find的宾语补足语部分都不能用不定式短语错误同选项(A);both…as well as…错误同选项(A)。
D选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
E选项:本选项句首的with短语是独立主格结构,这里没有任何问题。真正的错误出现在主句上,其主动语序为:
a joint Canadian-Russian study found opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year as both feasible and desirable.
find身后只能用宾语从句,不能用宾语+宾补的形式。这点类似于不定式和从句的区别,英语中通常允许在“宾语”和“宾补”间补上to be以突出两者的关系,例如:
(1) I put a book on the table.
(2) I put a book to be on the table.
这两个例句的语意基本相同。由于find的约束力较弱,所以身后不能用不定式短语的形式。
I find this book interesting.这句话是主谓宾宾补。find这个点在SC里不能直接算错吧?
同问!
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
although SVC, SVO
E选项主句还原后的语序为
a joint canadian-russian study(S) found(V)opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year(O)as both feasible and desirable(C)
find身后只能用宾语从句,不能用宾语+宾补的形式。
Dustin:独立主格可以表示对比之外的一切伴随状态,E选项的被动也不优
Split#1:both .., and ... 固定搭配,去掉选项A、C
Split#2: 选项B中,“study”不能被“used by only two or three planes a day”修饰,去掉。
Split#3: 被found的是“xx是可行的”而不是“xx”,因此去掉选项E
A选项:首先,代词it的指代对象只能是单数名词。
其次,found不论是主动还是被动,宾语和宾语的补足语部分都不能用不定式短语,应该用从句或ing形式来表达,这点考查了不定式和从句的区别。由于find的约束力较弱,所以其宾语和宾语的补足语不能用不定式to be的形式。
find身后只能用宾语从句,不能用宾语+宾补的形式。这点类似于不定式和从句的区别,英语中通常允许在“宾语”和“宾补”间补上to be以突出两者的关系,例如:
(1) I put a book on the table.
(2) I put a book to be on the table.
这两个例句的语意基本相同。由于find的约束力较弱,所以身后不能用不定式短语的形式。
I find this question confusing. 主谓宾宾补
sc
长难句
前中后排除一些小的语法错误,如both and
再从大方向把握意思,选出正确答案
A中后面的it不可以指前面的整个句子,只能指代一个单数名词。
find it possible to do:在逻辑上,被发现是“可行的”且“令人满意的”应该是“每年开放这些航线给更多的飞机”这件事,而不是某个单数名词(代词只能指代名词,不能指代句子)。其次,found不论是主动还是被动,宾语和宾语的补足语部分都不能用不定式短语,应该用从句(find possible that open.../find possible opening ...)或ing形式来表达,这点考查了不定式和从句的区别。由于find的约束力较弱,所以其宾语和宾语的补足语不能用不定式to be的形式。
E find opening 。。。as both feasible and desirable: find身后只能用宾语从句,不能用宾语+宾补的形式。这点类似于不定式和从句的区别,英语中通常允许在“宾语”和“宾补”间补上to be以突出两者的关系,例如:(1) I put a book on the table.(2) I put a book to be on the table.
这两个例句的语意基本相同。由于find的约束力较弱,所以身后不能用不定式短语的形式。
1. Both and;排A C
2.代词:it 不能指代句子,只能指代名词单数;排A B C
3.逻辑主语:排B C
4.E with
consider A as B,把A看作是B,如:These workers are considered (as) a high-risk group. 这些工人被视为属高风险人群。
留言错位置了吧,让我还特意回去看了下没consider啊。。。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
regard A as B或regard A as adj,如:regard manner as efficient,认为某物如何,不说as being或as to be
consider/think/deem/find A B或consider sth adj,认为某物如何,不加as
为什么A中说find不论是主动还是被动,宾语或宾补都不能跟to do,但是E中又说find后面不能跟宾语+宾补,到底能不能跟呀...
请问为什么A解释说found后用doing或者从句,但E中说find吼只能用从句呀?为什么doing不可以呢? 谢谢!
A it 没有指代 , both as well as错误 句子重心不对 B逻辑主语不对 IT 没有指代 C没有谓语动词 to be不对 it无指代 E句子重心不对
不好意思,点错了,应该是从语义出发,find后面应该接一个句子,也就是能飞很多航线这件事,如果是 doing ,那么核心意思在doing
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
it形式主语在这里指代条件状语从句显得很乱
(E) contains an unidiomatic “found X as Y” rather than“ found X to be Y”.
另外,原句中有but的转折关系,在E中丢了,还是要注意一下的(虽然我觉得好像并不存在转折关系……)
E 缺少了转折关系
E:独立主格也是对于主句的修饰
a
1. 代词it的指代对象只能是单数名词,并列连词but身后的句子是被动语态,主动语序为:
a joint Canadian-Russian study found it to be both feasible as well as desirable.
在逻辑上,被发现是“可行的”且“令人满意的”应该是“每年开放这些航线给更多的飞机”这件事,而不是某个单数名词(代词只能指代名词,不能指代句子)。
2,found不论是主动还是被动,宾语和宾语的补足语部分都不能用不定式短语,应该用从句或ing形式来表达,这点考查了不定式和从句的区别。由于find的约束力较弱,所以其宾语和宾语的补足语不能用不定式to be的形式。
3. both…and…是固定搭配,不能用both…as well as…。