About 5 million acres in the United States have been invaded by leafy spurge, a herbaceous plant from Eurasia with milky sap that gives mouth sores to cattle, displacing grasses and other cattle food and rendering rangeland worthless.
States have been invaded by leafy spurge, a herbaceous plant from Eurasia with milky sap that gives mouth sores to cattle, displacing grasses and other cattle food and rendering
States have been invaded by leafy spurge, a herbaceous plant from Eurasia, with milky sap, that gives mouth sores to cattle and displaces grasses and other cattle food, rendering
States have been invaded by leafy spurge, a herbaceous plant from Eurasia having milky sap that gives mouth sores to cattle and displacing grasses and other cattle food, rendering
States, having been invaded by leafy spurge, a herbaceous plant from Eurasia with milky sap that gives mouth sores to cattle, displaces grasses and other cattle food, and renders
States, having been invaded by leafy spurge, a herbaceous plant from Eurasia that has milky sap giving mouth sores to cattle and displacing grasses and other cattle food, rendering
题目分析:
本题长度较长,但难度不算大。大概意思为:
有很多美国的土地被乳浆草侵占了。乳浆草是一个从Eurasia来的草本植物。这个草本植物让小牛长了口腔溃疡并且代替了草和其它的小牛食物,让牧场一文不值。
选项分析:
A选项:划线部分最后的分词短语displacing grasses and other cattle food是a herbaceous plant gives mouth sores to cattle的伴随状语。但在逻辑上,由于“长口腔溃疡”和“代替草和其它的小牛食物”是乳浆草的两个方面事情,之间没有逻辑关系,因此,两者应该用并列句来表示,不能让一者为另一者的伴随状语(若是伴随状语,则两者变为了修饰关系)。
另外,displace句和render句之间应用修饰关系而不是并列关系。这是因为,代替了草和其它的小牛食物的结果是“让牧场一文不值(render rangeland worthless)”。
B选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
C选项:按照本选项的语法结构,having milky sap that gives mouth sores to cattle和displacing grasses and other cattle food是并列关系,但在逻辑上,两者不能并列。拥有 milky sap是这个草本植物的固有属性(无论这个草在哪里),而“代替草和其它的小牛食物”是这个草本植物入侵美国后的结果。
D选项:本选项缺少谓语动词。选项末的displaces和renders均为单数动词,不可能作为复数名词about 5 million acres in the United States的谓语动词。
E选项:本选项缺少谓语动词。
a sap导致的牛口腔溃疡 而导致的replacing grasses错误 并不是sap导致的
b with sap这里两个逗号隔开了 that修饰的是草本植物 没问题
c 按照本选项的语法结构,having milky sap that gives mouth sores to cattle和displacing grasses and other cattle food是并列关系,但在逻辑上,两者不能并列。拥有 milky sap是这个草本植物的固有属性(无论这个草在哪里),而“代替草和其它的小牛食物”是这个草本植物入侵美国后的结果。
”,that“不合理吧?还是跳过了插入语”, with milky sap,“,直接修饰前面的 herbaceous plant?
修饰plant,因为with部分是插入语,可以直接忽略,这样就是没有逗号,而直接修饰Plant登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
曼哈顿上说了,,ving的形式,如果前面是个句子,基本都是修饰整个句子的,就是句子的主语和动词一起的登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
B选项:,that gives mouth sores和displacing…,都是作定语的
C选项:and平行结构连接两个动词;having and displacing不应该平行;
D选项:句子没谓语;
E选项:同D
误选了B 就是因为没看到那几个单词的意思。。 区分不了平行还是修饰。。
A选项中,伴随状语一般不会出现跳跃修饰,所以displacing和rendering这两个伴随状语修饰的是gives mouth sores这件事,显然这两个动作在逻辑上没有修饰关系,草本植物让小牛长疮和草本植物让破坏土地属于草本植物的两个方面,而使土地无用化是草本植物破坏土地的后果,这两个动作之间明显有联系,B选项的语法结构正确的表述了这个意思
C选项中语法上having milky sap和displacing grasses平行,但两者在逻辑上并不平行,一个是草本植物的固有属性,一个是草本植物入侵美国后的后果
D选项中主谓不一致
E选项中缺少谓语动词