While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.
While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.
While the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants, the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants make the electricity they generate more expensive.
Even though it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes the electricity they generate more expensive.
It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, whereas the electricity they generate is more expensive, stemming from the fixed costs of building nuclear plants.
The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as other types of power plants, but the electricity they generate is made more expensive because of the fixed costs stemming from building nuclear plants.
题目分析:
本题较长,结构和从句都较多,需要大家耐心把句子看懂。
选项分析:
A选项:本选项中第一个it是一个形式主语,指代身后的不定式短语to run nuclear plants,还原为正常语序则有:
to run nuclear plants costs about the same as other types of power plants.
在逻辑上,costs about the same as other types of power plants的主语不能是不定式短语,而应该是名词短语,即,
Running nuclear plants costs about the same as other types of power plants
其考查了“不定式和ing的区别”。用之于本题,显然是在讨论运营核电站这件客观事实需要花费多少,而不是主观的某个人或团体运营核电站的情况,因此应该用ing短语。
另外,定语从句that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity的身前都是复数名词,所以其没有合理的修饰对象。
最后请注意一个没有错误的地方。状语从句the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants中的比较对象是没有任何问题的。这是一个省略现象,补全则有:
the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as the cost for other types of power plants.
这里的for基本上代替了of running,不直接用of是因为running也省略了。如果直接是of的话,会被认为是其它核电站的成本,而非运营成本。
B选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
C选项:to run nuclear plants 错误同(A);makes错误同(A)。
D选项:to run nuclear plants 错误同(A);另外,本选项中stemming from the fixed costs of building nuclear plants是the electricity they generate is more expensive的伴随状语(根据状语的就近修饰原则),所以stem的逻辑主语是the electricity,这是不正确的。在逻辑上,源自于建造核电站的固定成本的(stem from the fixed costs of building nuclear plants )应该是“电能更贵”这件事,而不是电能(the electricity)本身。
E选项:比较对象不对等。在逻辑上具有same关系的应该是“运营核电站的成本”和“运营其它类型电站的成本”,因此应该用The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as that of other types of power plants。
2-排除E,the same as前后比较对象不对等;
3--D里面的whereas, 是但是反之尽管的意思,作为连词链接这个句子,老感觉这里有怪不知道为什么。。有对whereas 持同样怀疑态度的请@我:(。不过这个不是重点,stemming是伴随,往上找他们主语,发现原来是electricity,显然不对,电费贵的原因是固定成本,而不是电自己;
妥妥地B;
whereas 表示对比?但是原句想让步 语气不对?总觉得这个whereas怪怪的 却说不出来哪里不对登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
同问一下【as for】的问题~
解析已更新。
解析已更新。登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
不是。第一个it确实是代词,但是第二个it是形式主语,不算代词,没有指代不一致的问题。登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
请问stemming可以理解成修饰the electricity they generate is more expensive整个句子而不是electricity本身?
当然不能~现在分词短语只能是伴随或者是定语,不论是哪一个,分词短语的逻辑主语都必须是一个词,而绝对不能是一个句子。
不是有一种表示结果的句末伴随状语的用法吗?那种情况下不是承接前一个句子吗?不就相当于一个句子是主语?
永远不会存在这种情况。之所以有这种情况存在的谣言,都是因为不了解伴随状语的形成机制导致的。可以点击直播中看之前的公开课哟~有一节是专门讲伴随状语和独立主格的。登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
另外,E选项中的made是不是应该去掉?或者改成is made more expensively?
1. A的选项分析的最下面已经写了,that makes是不对的。2. 不用去掉。is made是make的被动语态,相当于本来我写的是Jack makes the questions hard,现在改为The questions are made hard。
谢谢。关于上面第一个问题,补充问一下:that是否可以删除?It is the fixed costs (that) make...
当然不行。that makes本身引导一个定语从句,先行词做主语的时候,定语从句的连词that是绝对不会被省略的。登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
解析已更新,感谢指正。登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
解析已更新。登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论