Unlike the automobile company, whose research was based on crashes involving sport utility vehicles, the research conducted by the insurance company took into account such factors as a driver’s age, sex, and previous driving record.
company, whose research was based on
company, which researched
company, in its research of
company’s research, having been based on
company’s research on
这个题中关于having been done的问题,其实只要翻译一下选项就可以很轻松的看出D选项的问题。D的意思是:不像auto 公司的研究是基于crash的,保险公司的研究则考虑了更多东西。E则是,不像auto对crash的研究,保险公司的研究考虑了更多的东西。
在D当中,你要考虑更多因素,怎么可能研究的基础还不同呢?这明显是不合逻辑的。而E就很好的解决了这个矛盾,并且其逻辑更加合理。
having been based on crashes 分詞構句 可置放 句手中尾 其中放句中 可以能令讀者誤會 是修前or後 >> 不佳
D选项:比较对象虽然是对等的,但是having been based on crashes在本选项中更像是一个伴随状语,用来修饰整个题目的主句。这显然是不符合逻辑的,该部分在逻辑上应修饰company。
会引起歧义
不要妄图用一个点排除所有
D选项:比较对象虽然是对等的,但是having been based on crashes在本选项中更像是一个伴随状语,用来修饰整个题目的主句。这显然是不符合逻辑的,该部分在逻辑上应修饰company。
会引起歧义
ABC对比对象不对等,应该是 the research比 the research
C选项having been based on是伴随状语,修饰最近的动作,最近的动作为took into account 主语为the research conducted by the insurance company 。显然是不合理的,因为这个having been based on逻辑上是企图描述前方的 the automobile company’s research
E选项正确
d选项的having been based on is wordy, 并且it is unclear whether it modifies research conducted by the automobile company or the research conducted by the insurance company.
:比较对象虽然是对等的,但是having been based on crashes在本选项中更像是一个伴随状语,用来修饰整个题目的主句。这显然是不符合逻辑的,该部分在逻辑上应修饰company。
having been based on与company’s research用逗号隔开后,更像是一个伴随状语,而不是后者的定语。
考察:
比较对象对等
语意为王:
Unlike A, who do B, C do D.这个结构里通常要求do B和do C构成unlike的点。
A,Unlike the automobile company‘s research, based on crashes, the research took into account such factors as a driver’s age, sex, and previous driving record.
研究考虑司机的年龄、性别、驾驶记录与研究建立在碰撞的基础上没法unlike,要unlike的话是:另一家公司将研究建立在B基础上。
而且从常识理解,他们为啥考虑司机的年龄、性别、驾驶记录?为了研究。所以改成unlike the research on crashes,关于碰撞的研究,ok
语意:
D,having been based on表示先时性,不像A的研究,已经以撞车为基础,B的研究考虑了其他的。
E,不像A的关于汽车碰撞的研究,B的研究考虑了其他的。ok
同时,紧跟名词的comma+ing除了可以做定语修饰名词,还有充当伴随状语的歧义。
relative judgements:
D:having been based on VS based on
having been done,难道不是说被动么。这不对 吧
我也觉得这个having been done的被动不能修饰company
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
unlike 平行并列为这么简单都错QAQ
选项D having 有歧义 更像是修饰后面的 insurance company
aving been based on crashes在本选项中更像是一个伴随状语,用来修饰整个题目的主句。
D选项:’having been based on ‘ is wordy.这个结构会使'having been based on crashes involving sport utility vehicles'更倾向于修饰'the research conducted by the insurance company.而不是the automobile company'
个人认为是 D. company’s research, having been based on 和E. research on ... 语义有变化,前者是基于...的研究,一个是对...的研究
whereas 和while也有比较的层 面的意思,能与unlike一样的用法要求平行吗?
不需要完全平行,句意上能表达出合适的对比关系即可
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论