Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, but it was found by a joint Canadian-Russian study to be both feasible as well as desirable if those routes are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year.
Air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, but it was found by a joint Canadian-Russian study to be both feasible as well as desirable if those routes are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year.
Currently used by only two or three planes a day, a joint Canadian-Russian study has found that if air traffic routes over the North Pole are opened to thousands more commercial planes a year, it would be both feasible and desirable.
A joint Canadian-Russian study, finding it to be both feasible as well as desirable to open air traffic routes over the North Pole, which are currently used by only two or three planes a day, to thousands more commercial planes a year.
Although air traffic routes over the North Pole are currently used by only two or three planes a day, a joint Canadian-Russian study has found that opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year is both feasible and desirable.
With air traffic routes over the North Pole currently used by only two or three planes a day, opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year has been found by a joint Canadian-Russian study as both feasible and desirable.
题目分析:
本题全划线,看似比较乱,但实则非常简单,只要将每个选项的成分找清,立刻可以找到答案。
选项分析:
A选项:首先,代词it的指代对象只能是单数名词,并列连词but身后的句子是被动语态,主动语序为:
a joint Canadian-Russian study found it to be both feasible as well as desirable.
在逻辑上,被发现是“可行的”且“令人满意的”应该是“每年开放这些航线给更多的飞机”这件事,而不是某个单数名词(代词只能指代名词,不能指代句子)。
其次,found不论是主动还是被动,宾语和宾语的补足语部分都不能用不定式短语,应该用从句或ing形式来表达,这点考查了不定式和从句的区别。由于find的约束力较弱,所以其宾语和宾语的补足语不能用不定式to be的形式。
再次,both…and…是固定搭配,不能用both…as well as…。
B选项:本选项句首的currently used by only two or three planes a day是一个过去分词短语,在句中必然是伴随状语,其逻辑主句和其所修饰的句子的主语相同,即,a joint Canadian-Russian study。但在逻辑上,“每天被2~3个飞机用”的应该是“航线”,而不是“研究”。
另外,代词it的指代对象有误同选项(A)。
C选项:本选项没有谓语动词;代词 it的指代对象有误同选项(A);find的宾语补足语部分都不能用不定式短语错误同选项(A);both…as well as…错误同选项(A)。
D选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
E选项:本选项句首的with短语是独立主格结构,这里没有任何问题。真正的错误出现在主句上,其主动语序为:
a joint Canadian-Russian study found opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year as both feasible and desirable.
find身后只能用宾语从句,不能用宾语+宾补的形式。这点类似于不定式和从句的区别,英语中通常允许在“宾语”和“宾补”间补上to be以突出两者的关系,例如:
(1) I put a book on the table.
(2) I put a book to be on the table.
这两个例句的语意基本相同。由于find的约束力较弱,所以身后不能用不定式短语的形式。
1、代词只能指代名词,不能指代句子。比如it在作为代词的时候只能指代单数名词,不能指代句子
2、with在句首经常引导独立主格结构
3、find之后能接什么
find身后只能用宾语从句或ing形式来表达,不能用宾语+宾补的形式。这点类似于不定式和从句的区别,英语中通常允许在“宾语”和“宾补”间补上to be以突出两者的关系,例如:
(1) I put a book on the table.
(2) I put a book to be on the table.
这两个例句的语意基本相同。由于find的约束力较弱,所以身后不能用不定式短语的形式。
错选E,当时区别的点在与although和with,其实这点不用考虑。find是一个约束力比较弱的词,当然后不能加 to do, 而E中as both ....就是宾补的成分,所以相当与to do,这点是不对的。
find的宾语补足语不能用to be
在百度找find的语法时找到find+宾语+宾补(不定式):They find the Chinese people to be happy and cheerful. 那这句话应该就是错的咯?
E选项:被动语态 has been found by a joint Canadian-Russian study as both很wordy
缺少原句转折
A both as well as漏看
it 指代 to be 修饰 but转折 都有问题
B currently 后面的修饰有问题 it指代
C没谓语 E with 顺承 无转折意
find身后只能用宾语从句,不能用宾语+宾补的形式。
A : It was found that ... => to be wrong
Both ... as well as => Wrong
我觉得这里find用法解释得不对
我觉得用约束力来解释的方法太玄妙了。。先知道答案才能倒着推出来约束力
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
E的解释不对吧。。。. . . has been found AS is unidiomatic 但是 FOUND TO BE是正确的啊
E的解释不对吧。。。. . . has been found AS is unidiomatic 但是 FOUND TO BE是正确的啊
我也觉得是正确的
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
A选项:both ...and..., not both...as well as...; found ...to be ...有问题,found后接that从句或宾补;
B选项:’Currently used by...‘ illogically modifies ' a joint Canadian-Russian study'; it 指代不明确;
C选项:both feasible as well as desirable;整个句子没有谓语;
E选项:被动语态 has been found by a joint Canadian-Russian study as both很wordy
我觉得find也可跟宾语+宾补,例如:find a way to success
请老师解释下?
你这里用的是the way to success, 算是way的一种用法,即: “the way to..”
和the key to the door类似
和find没有半毛钱关系
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
老师,C选项的it可否理解为形式宾语,指代真正的宾语“to open air traffic routes over the North Pole”?所以,其实it的指代是没错的
老师,E选项从外延和内涵的角度不能理解,你上课时举了一个宾补的例子是I see him standing on the ground. 当时我问你看怎么给他添加属性,你说你看过去,在你的视角里他才站在那里,find这个词和see应该是一样的吧,为什么就不能加宾补了呀?with引导的独立主格能表示一种转折关系么,如果不行,那我只能通过这一点选D了,请老师解答
因为see是一个感官动词,所以能带ing做宾补吧
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
e 句间关系改变了,缺少原句转折关系
E选项没有看懂老师的解释
同没看懂。。。
就是说e解释里 1,2 两句活是相当的,同理opening 。。。 has been found as both feasible and desirable. 就等于opening 。。。 has been found to be both feasible and desirable. 而find后不能用不定式,所以e不对
当时是没看懂E哪里用不定式了。现在明白了,解释说的是,这里的宾补用得不对。而这个从句和宾补的区别,就相当于从句和不定式的区别。
懂啦~谢谢!
嗯嗯,我也经常是第二次看就懂了
看完你的懂啦!~谢谢
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
这个it不能看作是形式主语吗?
it作形式主语或形式宾语,只能只带不定式或者that从句
BTW,你说的这个it,是哪个选项里面的it,A当中的吗?
嗯 是的 因为看到OG里面只有B选项指出了 the pronoun it has no clear antecedent 我在想是否意味着A中的it没有问题呢?
你顺着A的意思来说的话这个it就肯定不能理解为形式主语。它的后面是it was found to be....说明这个是实一个有实意的代词。然后往前面半句找指代对象,发现根本没有带入后可以解释的通的单数名词,这个it就肯定有问题啦
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
find约束力较弱,不能用不定式
A:both ...as well as...错误;it指代同B
B:过去分词used开头,其逻辑主语为主句主语,主语应该改成air traffic routes;it只能指代单数名词,不能指代一件事情,句意是opening those routes to thousands more commercial planes a year这件事是feasible and desirable的,不能用it指代
C:没有谓语
E:有明确的动作发出者最好不要用被动语态
subject find sth adj
这个句式变成被动的话是sth be found by subject adj,因此这里的as是多余的.这么理解对吗?
你举例的被动句转换为主动就是,sb. find sth. adj, 按照老师说的,find后面只能接从句,可能这个举例本身也不是很对。但find as应该是肯定不对的,翻译成汉语的逻辑也很奇怪。但口语中会有, i find it good...咱俩时间都不咋多了,我觉得RON有一个建议我很buy in,多去思考错误的选项为什么错了,不要太过于试图去看如何将错误的选项修正正确,因为选项本身可能错的非常不符合规矩,非要把一个不符合规矩的东西勉强改为可以接受的形式,可能浪费了很多时间,自己也跑偏了。我觉得如果奔着780的人,可以这样,我们这样的平民,这种投入回报不成正比。
find没问题,B选校不是plane去use那个study。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论