扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2008E1-SC-189
She was less successful after she had emigrated to New York compared to her native Germany, photographer Lotte Jacobi nevertheless earned a small group of discerning admirers, and her photographs were eventually exhibited in prestigious galleries across the United States.
She was less successful after she had emigrated to New York compared to
Being less successful after she had emigrated to New York as compared to
Less successful after she emigrated to New York than she had been in
Although she was less successful after emigrating to New York when compared to
She had been less successful after emigrating to New York than in
题目分析：
本题中我们可以发现平行制造者less than，其连接的两者需要“可比”。本题中对比的内容显然是“Lotte Jacobi在纽约”和“Lotte Jacobi曾经在德国”，因此(A)(B)(D)(E)的比较对象均是不正确的（如果时态不同，则不能省略动词），答案为(C)。
选项分析：
略
我的理解是：这句话的比较双方是“Lotte Jacobi在纽约成功”和“Lotte Jacobi曾经在德国成功“比较，比较成功的程度。还原回来比较双方是"(She was) successful after she emigrated to New York"和 ”she had been (successful) in her native Germany“因为前面有successful所以第二个省略，导致大部分人会以为she had been in Germany是一整句话。
我认为关于C选项的解读有误导性，很明显C选项比较双方不是LJ在纽约和LJ曾经在德国，逻辑上讲这是两个事实，没有比较的对象；语法上讲，后面是she had been in her native Germany,前面是after she emigrated to New York，一个句子没法和一个短语比。至少也得加个when she had been in her native Germany才说得通啊，即使非要强说是she emigrated to New York 和 she had been …… Germany比较，那双方并列的话前面的介词应该是两者通用，语义上又说不通。
我也是真的傻，看了无数遍才发现比较的是两个时间点而不是两个人，我怎么会一直以为是两个人呢？（German是德国人，Germany是德国）
比较的对象应该是：after she emigrated to New York 与 she had been in her native Germany（德国，不是德国的，老是搞错！影响理解）
A，E是两个完整句子中间没有连词，错；B,D没有than
A选项：平行制造者less ...than..., 没有less...compared to/ as compared to这样的表达；两个完整的句子之间没有连词，而是只有一个逗号；
B选项：'being...' is unnecessarily wordy and awkward;
D选项：平行制造者less ...than..., 没有less...compared to/ as compared to这样的表达；
E选项：两个完整的句子之间没有连词，而是只有一个逗号；过去完成时应该接在德国这段经历，跟移民到美国比较；
A:less没有than，两句之间没有连词
B:伴随状语，主语和主句相同，less没有than没有比较对象
C: less adj. 放在句首是省略being的伴随，than身前身后分段比较
D：连词+doing是伴随状语；less没有than
E：主句之间缺少连词
选项D：less不能搭配compared to，可以排除。
nevertheless
有nevertheless也是run on啊，问题在于C选项less+形容词作修饰成分，后面跟完整句子，不构成run on条件
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
标记下 做题时第一时间没想到从平行来 解题 继续努力吧
less more这种比较词和than搭配而不是和compared to 。C中比较对象是移民到美国和在德国的时候。比较结构中必须判断好比较对象。
没有注意到主句有一个Nevertheless，以为是一个run-on
使用compare to这种结构时不要再使用 less more这种比较级，而是直接给出数据。
I this year's unemployment rate is 12%, compared to 4% in 1994
A选项：平行制造者less ...than..., 没有less...compared to/ as compared to这样的表达；两个完整的句子之间没有连词，而是只有一个逗号；
B选项：'being...' is unnecessarily wordy and awkward;
D选项：平行制造者less ...than..., 没有less...compared to/ as compared to这样的表达；
E选项：两个完整的句子之间没有连词，而是只有一个逗号；过去完成时应该接在德国这段经历，跟移民到美国比较；
比较中Less/more等词是和than搭配的而不是compare to这种词； E选项中的比较结构than后面In Germany的确是和to New York并列，这样写的话emigrating这个动词也会继承给in Germany, 而显然她没有移民到德国
A She和photographer Lotte Jacobi 没有连词
B being错误 had emigrated 错误
D after emigrating to New York when (she was)compared to her native Germany 不应该省略she was
E 没有连词同A
1-比较结构是成对儿出现的，less +than，没有less ...compared这种说法，因此i排除ABD；
2-E和后面的题干分别是两个独立的句子，之间需要连词，nevertheless是副词，不能够链接两个句子，排除E；
E. A comma is insufficient to join two independent clauses into a single sentence; past-perfect tense is misleading, since it refers to J's experience in New York, which in fact followed her experience in Germany.
不能光看语法 要注意语义 点出了德国是native 就和emigrate矛盾了
但是愚蠢的我选择了B，也不知道是不是当时一道闪电击中了我的脑袋
还可以用发生的时间顺序排除
从前往后应该是：德国--搬到纽约--不那么厉害了
所以应该分别是had been in Germany, moved to New York 和 (being) less successful now
有比较急请选择than