扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / OG2020-CR-696
A moderately large city is redesigning its central downtown area and is considering a plan that would reduce the number of lanes for automobiles and trucks and increase those for bicycles and pedestrians. The intent is to attract more workers and shoppers to downtown businesses by making downtown easier to reach and more pleasant to move around in.
Which of the following would, if true, most strongly support the prediction that the plan would achieve its goal?
People who make a habit of walking or bicycling whenever feasible derive significant health benefits from doing so.
Most people who prefer to shop at suburban malls instead of downtown urban areas do so because parking is easier and cheaper at the former.
In other moderately sized cities where measures were taken to make downtowns more accessible for walkers and cyclists, downtown businesses began to thrive.
If the proposed lane restrictions on drivers are rigorously enforced, more people will likely be attracted to downtown businesses than would otherwise be.
Most people who own and frequently ride bicycles for recreational purposes live at a significant distance from downtown urban areas.
READ THE SENTENCE LITERALLY.
Choice c only gives a condition followed by IF, but no more information is provided to show whether the IF conditions would be the real case, i.e. the regulation is fully enforced, so it is of little help to the argument
方案：减少downtown的机动车道，增加自行车和行人道
目的：通过改善交通，吸引更多的购物者和工作者来downtown
问加强？
C选项：类比其他类似地方的举措带来商业繁荣，暗指本方案也会成功。
D：如果关于对机动车道的限制被很好地执行了，相比其他的举措，改善交通的举措会吸引更多人来downtown。
【D选项的问题有两个，第一是重复前提，说方案被执行，就会有人来，但是没有对方案的可行性或者可操作性进行加强，相当于说了句废话；第二，并不需要把改善交通的举措和其他的举措进行比较，这个不是讨论方案会不会成不成功的点】
谢谢！
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
than would otherwise be. 的意思是，如果没有严格限制，可能有一点点限制
用不同城市做对比，得出正确答案！
D. It might be the case that rigorously enforcing lane restrictions will attract more people to downtown business than would otherwise be the case, but the information provided does not indicate how strictly lane restrictions will be enforced.
C直接说了商业会更加繁荣（方案可以直接达到目的 ），D中一方面又添加了条件，并且只提到了people，文中强调是shoppers and workers。
d错因为没有引入new information， 这是做加强题最需要注意的必须引入new info
而c成了这几个中还算好的
有的时候重复原文是对的，有的时候是错的，这样说吧，选最优的的，如果其他的都太差了，像D也可以选，但是这题的C已经非常好了，所以选C不选D
D错是不是因为 D说是对司机的限制，而题目中说的是 减少摩托车和卡车车道，并非对司机的限制。偷换概念？
还是不太明白D为什么错，方案被严格执行的情况下，能够达到吸引更多人去downtown business的目的，不是说明了方案的可行性吗？感觉比C单纯用别的城市来类比更有说服力啊...
Goal：吸引更多的工人和消费者到市中心的商场。Plan：减少汽车道，增加行人和自行车道。问support
choice c, 在其他相当面积的城市采取措施让downtown对于骑车人和行人更容易接近以后，downtown business开始复活了。correct，类比了一个例子
choice d, 如果针对司机的限制严格执行，更多人会被吸引到downtown business，比起没有执行这种限制。说的是restriction吸引更多人，但是choice c直接提到会enhance downtown business
虽然选对了···但还是想问一下D为什么不对
我感觉D只是在重复文章中方案想要达到的结果，没有意义
重述原文事实
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
OA是C， 答案错了