Historians remain divided over the role of banks in facilitating economic growth in the United States in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Some scholars contend that banks played a minor role in the nation's growing economy. Financial institutions, they argue, appeared only after the economy had begun to develop, and once organized, followed conservative lending practices, providing aid to established commercial enterprises but shunning those, such as manufacturing and transportation projects, that were more uncertain and capital-intensive (i.e., requiring greater expenditures in the form of capital than in labor).
A growing number of historians argue, in contrast, that banks were crucial in transforming the early national economy. When state legislatures began granting more bank charters in the 1790s and early 1800s, the supply of credit rose accordingly. Unlike the earliest banks, which had primarily provided short-term loans to well-connected merchants, the banks of the early nineteenth century issued credit widely. As Paul Gilje asserts, the expansion and democratization of credit in the early nineteenth century became the driving force of the American economy, as banks began furnishing large amounts of capital to transportation and industrial enterprises. The exception, such historians argue, was in the South; here, the overwhelmingly agrarian nature of the economy generated outright opposition to banks, which were seen as monopolistic institutions controlled by an elite group of planters.
The passage suggests that the scholars mentioned in the highlighted text would argue that the reason banks tended not to fund manufacturing and transportation projects in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries was that
these projects, being well established and well capitalized, did not need substantial long-term financing from banks
these projects entailed a level of risk that was too great for banks' conservative lending practices
banks preferred to invest in other, more speculative projects that offered the potential for higher returns
bank managers believed that these projects would be unlikely to contribute significantly to economic growth in the new country
bank managers believed funding these projects would result in credit being extended to too many borrowers
题目分析:
文章细节题:高亮的学者认为银行不资助制造业和交通业的原因是?
原文:这些学者认为银行起到的作用很小。他们认为,金融机构只有在经济已经开始发展的时候才会出现,并且一旦出现,只从事保守的借贷工作——给已经建立的企业提供帮助,但回避那些不确定性高且需要大量资金的项目,比如说制造业和交通业。
(原文已经将原因阐述的很明白:高风险,高投入,所以只要找和这个意思相近的即可)
选项分析:
A选项:这些已经建立且资本化的项目不需要银行贷款。
B选项:正确。这些项目的风险对从事保守借贷业务的银行来说太高了。
C选项:银行更愿意投资有高回报的项目。
D选项:银行认为这些项目对经济发展没啥帮助。
E选项:银行认为资助这些项目会导致太多人来借钱。
定位:such as manufacturing and transportation projects, that were more uncertain and capital-intensive (i.e., requiring greater expenditures in the form of capital than in labor). 不稳定,需要更多的资金而不是劳力
误选a, 搞错了,问题再问那些“that the reason banks tended not to fund manufacturing and transportation projects ”, the projects, 不是文中那些被借贷的project。 看清楚选项:
A:these projects, being well established and well capitalized, did not need substantial long-term financing from banks。。。。。。是在解释问题中的project,显然不对。。
找准定位
Unlike the earliest banks, which had primarily provided short-term loans to well-connected merchants,在第二段
在第一段scholar附近没有提及
C选项搞懂原文意思 speculative 投机的 所以更冒险,但原文中说的是 conservative lending practices,所以是相反意思
but shunning those, such as manufacturing and transportation projects, that were more uncertain and capital-intensive 。
C选项:for higher returns文章提到conservative lending practices,显然这点上错误
D选项:does not mention or provide a basis for inferences about this
E选项:does not mention or provide a basis for inferences about this
定位到- were more uncertain and capital-intensive (i.e., requiring greater expenditures in the form of capital than in labor).
选B